Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-03 15:40

>>734

Your argument is steeped in ignorance and subjective statements that don't make sense. First you said Sub-Saharans didn't have civilization, then you changed it to "Great civilization", then that was proven false. Then you asked why they didn't "get their shit together".

Well, it turns out those Hittites of your discovered metal and a whole bunch of other stuff before the rest of world and they failed. You don't have a race-related answer for that, do you? Of course not, because you percieve whites as a most intelligent so even when their civilizations seem on the brink of destruction, they are given the benefit of the doubt because they are white.

How is that not racism?

Nevermind the fact that I know your ideals can only lead to a facsist and totalitarian society.

These aren't strawmen.

These are the very root of your argument because you made your point singling out a group of people instead of talking about the human race as a whole. When you throw out ignorant bollocks like: "Blacks are naturally dumb and always have been." It's like you're ignoring what we know about nature, nuture and IQ.

Nurture can effect genetics. This is why this argument is so moot.

Newer Posts