I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>727
Stop with the strawmen.  You haven't even tried to understand our argument.  All you do is assign us motivations out of the blue and use them to call us ignorant. 

Wikipedia's IQ and race article is a very well referenced and researched article, maintained by a few of the pre-eminent experts in the field, as is the article on g theory (the one absolute measure of intelligence that crosses cultural boundaries, try this on for size: http//www.p/... Scientific American, maintained by the university of  toronto of all places).  The body of evidence that IQ is not only genetic, but that it can determine someone's likeliness to succeed is huge. 

Once again, think of it this way;(i'm not the person who made this point originally) a smart person has the ability to choose his or her future, to be a pauper or a doctor, while a stupid person is destined for poverty no matter what he or she may want.  Or would you just rather live in fairy-land, and stop human progress?  (BTW, eugenics would not be a government controlled endeavor, like Nazism...   It'd most likely come about in an evolutionary way, as parents choose genes for their children that will make them most likely to succeed.  This includes intelligence.  There'd probably be quite a few restrictions put in place on that too, but that's really the realm of speculation)