I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>639

There isn't a biological assertion for "race". You wanna drag out the alelle frequency, haplotypes tripe that I debunked eons ago?


>>637
>>638

If the "you'll just label me afrocentric!" stance is a strawman...then the "you'll just label me a racist/idiot" stance is a strawman. Apparently one without a brain seeing as how you said that then went onto you use the word "nigger" a million times in the next fucking post! Guess what? All that shit you said at the end of >>638? Makes you a racist.

The Hittites: So. What? Have you seen the wikipedia article on these guys? :D There's so much contraversy over who they were or if they even existed that it's almost a moot point. However, what drives it over the edge the fact that: This argument was never about who first discovered iron in the first place.

You said Sub-Saharan Africans didn't have a civilization on par with others: You were wrong. You said Sub-Saharan Africans didn't invent stone buildings or metal tools or contribute to anything: You were wrong.

So Africa got colonialized? So did Europe, Syria, China, Japan, nearly everywhere at some point. Who knows why civilizations fail? Why did the Hittites fail? Gee, you'd think with that 1500 hundred year head start they specifically would've been more dominant. Instead they've been reduced to a near-myth.

African Colonization was a modern colonization, a complete purging of history and culture and it only ended quite literally under 30 years ago!, blacks have had civil rights for around 50 years! It took Japan a good 200 years to get their shit  together and took China even longer than that. (China *still* doesn't have it's shit together if you ask me)

In the end it's a single question: What biological proof to you have that any civilization failed because of genetics or lack of intelligence? Where's the proof that Africa's was?

Your arguments has been nothing more than these grand gestures of denial, edging dangerously close to a white supremist slant. Either you use scientific methodology to arrive an assertion or you don't. Educated people know this and if you don't think education makes a difference- then you are uneducated.

I'm not gonna take maturity lessons from a guy that values wikipedia over educational institutions and runs around calling people niggers from the safety of the internets. And people on "college campus" don't "hand out ass whoopings" for calling someone a baby bird. (that's high school shit)

Face it: You *are* a baby bird. There *is* alot of shit you obviously don't understand about human culture and society and how when you take even one step back; there's this creepy almost surreal common thread running through humanity as a whole. Same symbols, similar creation stories and imagery. Some history written, some oral. I just feel bad that you're probably going to spend so much time with your up your ass that you'll never realize it.