Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-06 11:01

>>636
Wikipedia is peer reviewed.  It still doesn't change the fact that they can say anything they want to if they want to.  Plus anyone who disagrees with them is labelled a racist or an ignoramous or whatever.

How obtuse that you mention that neanderthals aren't homosapien...  Did I ever even imply that neanderthals themselves had anything to do with this debate?  NO.  I was using their situation to illustrate a point, that universities aren't exactly the great bastion of truth in our society. 

And most of the links you posted that weren't just "look at the pictures we took of this beautiful site!" were lecture notes, dude.  I don't consider pictures particularly relevant to this discusssion.  Sure, there are ruins there, but we don't know anything about them, and they had no written language and there exists no reliable account of what happened. 

And no matter how much you want to believe otherwise, it doesn't change the fact that the hittites of the mesopotamian area were the first people to use iron almost 1500 years before any of the information you've presented.  Here's a link since you seem to hold .edu shit in such high regard:

http://www2.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/hittite.htm

They were working with iron, had a written language, and all that shit millinea before the information presented in your dumbass "iron age of africa" link.

All your arguments are failure wrapped up in hype.  And all this "oh you're not in college like I am! LOLXORS" shows your fucking immaturity, as well as labels you as being a certain age (why you don't realize that is beyond me).  Fucking grow up, damn.  You should really read http://www.world4ch.org/read/newpol/1138390786/

Newer Posts