Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-06 9:08

>>635

My argument hasn't changed. If you think it has: Provide proof. And please...do give us specifics. :)

Neanderthal's are not homosapien. Therefore: Irrelevant rubbish. But regarding your point: Yeah, people will deny data exists based on their own emotion. I know this because you're doing it right now.

I've never *seen* a white guy create the first combustion engine or the first *anything*, but until I find contensious data/empirical evidence that states otherwise...I give it the benefit of the doubt.

Until you can bring something to the debate that at the very least directly contends with what I've said then you're doing nothing but hanging onto a lofty dream-like concept of the truth. Click the links. *Look* at the pictures. *Read* the words. I know you haven't even looked because you refer to them as "lectures". Haha...OOOOooookkkk...the information is presented there in the same way it would be presented on wikipedia.

By the way?

State University's v.s wikipedia: State uni's win. Once you get to college maybe you'll understand that they just don't throw whatever they want up into the curriculum. It's peer reviewed.

Yale is an educational institution.

Wikipedia is the 4chan.org of online encyclopedias.

As for your last bit, I already told you why, baby bird. Did you not read >>580? Did you just ignore it and hope I wouldn't remember that I answered this question already? I can repost it if you want, but I'd rather treat you with some semblance of dignity.

Newer Posts