I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>634
Especially when you change it about four times.

Anyway, if you would have thought about it long enough, you'd have gotten my point with the whole neanderthal thing. It shows that people will deny that data even exists based on their own emotion, and that this happens a whole lot in academia where everyone is supposedly professional thinkers.  If you'd noticed, all your links were from lecture notes for classes ON african civilization, so they'd of course have a vested interest in pointing out the virtures of african civilization...  I mean, it's what you took the class for, right?

And why you won't even answer a fucking hypothetical is beyond me.  When you respond to a question posed solely for the sake of argument, and one that exists in happy fairy land where environment can really be exactly the same, and eliminates all other factors with your "THAT CAN'T REALLY HAPPEN" it seems very obtuse.  It's a thought experiment, and if you'd really believed it you'd answer in the affirmative.  Another way out for you would be to say that yes, there would be marginal differences, but not enough to in any way affect their ability to produce and contribute to society. Both of those would save your argument.  But you didn't do that, and I really can't figure out why.