Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-05 7:48

>>612


Hasty retreating, rushed rationalizations, totally semantical and wrong. Can't put it any other way. If you feel this evidence is in question then prove it wrong. Find a scientist or historian that specifically says: "Oh, that's not true...Africa didn't do that." - I highly doubt these colleges made this shit up "on a whim".

It's not my fault if you want to turn a blind eye to the truth.  We can't treat your crippling ignorance until you admit that you were wrong.

And who said anything about blast furances? Are you trying to shift the argument? Because I didn't say anything about blast furnances. I said Iron. And eons ago I mentioned steel.

Zimbabwe proves everything. You (the opposition) said Africans didn't have stone buildings. They did. And one thing you have to understand: Why would sub-sahara Africa...hotter than most, if not all of the regions you listed...need insulated stone buildings? That'd be like living in an oven.

Give me a break here, guy. You asked for proof and this is as good as it gets. .edu carries more weight than wikipedia. It just does. Don't get all butthurt because you got caught in a lie. It's unseemingly when you fail and lose without grace.

"I never said negroes were animals, just stupid"

Suuuuuuuurre. Everything you say implies them being animalistic savages. Sorry...you're wrong. If you can find something saying all this shit didn't happen...then by allllllllll means. :)

The point is: You can't.

Now just answer the questions:

Now this evidence begs many questions. Are these all lies? Am I supposed trust wikipedia or colleges? Again am I supposed to trust white systematic colonizers with African history in the same way that I should trust a Nazi with Jewish history? Just answer the question.

Still questions from >>600 remain unanswered.

If you really believe genetics was so basic to human intellect and therefore so unchangable then why is it so hard to believe that the people that left Africa already possessed the intellect needed for the advancements we've seen as a human race? Why would have their environment mattered then, if it doesn't matter *now*? Why would skin color make a difference?

Newer Posts