I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>595

I don't want to hear anymore bollocks about attacks. I have been attacked with ad hominems by you and the opposition since the beginning. Your statements are hypocritical.

Secondly, when you're referring an obviously unchangable and uncontrollable factor like genetics, you imply absolutism. If that's not what you intend to do- then you need pay more attention to your argument. Stop trying to hammer home the idea the idea that negroids are genetically inferior in intellect- because intellect just doesn't work like that. It isn't set up in such a way where genetics alone define how intelligent you are.

Let's forget for a moment the accepted fact that IQ doesn't really measure your intelligence in the first place. I'd be very interested in how you aquired the IQs for people who existed before 1904. (When the IQ test was invented and African colonialsim was in full swing.) Assuming a group of people were more or less intelligent because of the "stuff they had" isn't scientific method. It's just not.

Returning to: >>598

It's funny. "Maybe racism isn't the answer." - Yet, you're probably one of the first white guys to cry about "reverse racism.". And in order to make eugenics work you would need a facist and totalitarian government and a nationalist society. 'Nuff said.

Your entire argument is funny when it comes to white people- it's like you can't admit to yourselves that you copied more than invented, merely changed more than evolved and that your temporary rule of earth wasn't exactly what it was: Chance. (and temporary)

You can't accept the fact that for all biological (and therefore genetic) purposes: You and everyone else on this planet is a variation of a sub-saharan negroid. If you really believe genetics was so basic to human intellect and therefore so unchangable then why is it so hard to believe that the people that left Africa already possessed the intellect meeded for the advancements we've seen as a human race? Why would have their enviroment mattered? Why would skin color make a difference?

People are inherantly different as a generality- but even those black skinned Africans that left African didn't percieve themselves as different races. The very concept of race seems to me to be "different looking negroids, living different ways of life." It didn't "exist" then and it doesn't exist biologically now. I guess I just don't understand this entire approach at all. Maybe that's because the phrase "Maybe racism isn't the answer" wouldn't come out of my mouth.

Heh.

"Maybe."