I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>424
Actually it's more simple than that. Anti-chan is a grunt not a mastermind in the liberal cult of defying the truth. All anti-chan does is claim our evidence is irrelevant on the grounds that the factors which have harmed and dragged down all peoples only occurred to black peoples.

Anti-chan also request genetic evidence, when genetic evidence concerning race is sketchy at best in the public knowledge thanks to the efforts of marxist-clean-slate types. Go to any library and look for books on intelligence, you will find many cut short references on intelligence and ethnicity. The story goes something like, "whites have higher iqs than blacks because of environmental influences as shown by the differences in IQs of uneducated and educated whites" and cut short here not even comparing the iqs of educated blacks and whites or uneducated blacks and whites. Which if the reader has the initiative to compare results manually can see the differences for himself.

Black people are human, they are sentient and have the intelligence to perform the jobs that the majority of the population of other races do and it would be evil to treat them like dirt, but what is also evil is to ignore the truth and curse future generations with their genes, we can avoid both evils. Some blacks are capable of becomming physicists and doctors, but it is simply a matter of there being a higher proportion of non-blacks capable of doing this compared to the proportion in the black population. Environment plays a strong role, yes, but it's simple maths that extra intelligence allows a civilisation to make the environment a little better, which makes their intelligence a little bit better until they simpler can't go any further etc etc.. By the time the civilisation reaches equilibirum, waiting for iron working to be discoverred by chance before it can progress further for example, the more intelligent civilisation will be visibly more advanced than the other. The Egyptians will have a complex irrigation system allowing farmland to go deep into the desert and a silt layer next to the nile and measuring devices to predict the rate of flood and whether they should open canals or not and will have villages built on elevations next to the Nile so they can live next to a water supply during the flood season, where as the Nubians will simply farm the silt and live on the flood boundary.