Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-09 20:20

Anti-chan's plan for argument:

If you prove that there is such a thing as race, he'll tell you that it doesn't affect intelligence.

If you prove to him that race affects intelligence, he'll talk about how it doesn't affect their chances of success. (it was all colonialism's fault)

If you prove that other races/ethnicities/cultures ETC... managed to recover after getting out from underneath the boot of european colonialism, he'll flop right back to talking about how race doesn't exist.

All the while he'll scream about how the scientific method tells him that he's justified believing everything he does, without making it clear just how he used the scientific method. (Scientific method is only valid in experiments... do you have records of experiments where races were pitted against one another in a study controlled for all variables?  Or do you just read a book by some crackpot and say that's valid usage of the scientific method?)

Another thing he'll keep screaming is "THERE IS NO RACE!!!!!!!!!!"  WHAT IS UP WITH THAT bullshit?  What the hell does that even mean?  Race is just another word for a population of people with similar genetics.  If it's true that there's no race, then, logically, every once in a while a black couple should produce a white blondeheaded daughter?  Why hasn't that happened, anti-chan?

Or if all else fails, anti-chan may decide to throw some gay insults at you that only bring to light his own repressed homosexuality.

Newer Posts