I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>424

Note you said: "If"

Race, is unprovable. So called "racial differences" were only classified as such in the first place under false non-genetic, non-biological pretenses. If one person didn't make the mistake, the false assumption that different skin color means different biology...we wouldn't be having this discussion.

All humans have the ability to inherit traits- but everyone on earth stems from one "race" of negroids. Humans are negroids with varied traits selected for by the evironment for better surviviability. Blond hair, blue eyes, brain size, these are just traits. Nothing more, nothing less. And it burns you up inside. You can't stand the fact that you are nothing but a pink negroid.

You can't divide IQ among "racial lines" that don't exist. IQ isn't a good universal guage of intelligence. You have no proof of your ancestors IQs, but considering that we're judgeing them based on the modern IQ test, we know they'd fail. You have no proof that leaps in civilization required a high IQ. 

I'm saying that Colonialism didn't disenfranchise "negroids", I'm saying that it disenfranchised a group of people *YOU* termed as negroids out of the human need to classify. The last traces of modern colonialism left Africa in the late 80's. American "Blacks" just got the right to vote 40 or so years ago, stable educated middle class didn't come until a generation later.  Negroids were the only people who were *consistant* slaves. Tell me: Is it fair to judge their IQ by european standard? You've excepting them to catch up to everyone else in 20-40 years. How is that fair? 

As for the name calling...eh.

Complaining about my name calling is some hypocritical crybaby bullshit. If you can't take it, then don't fucking dish it out.