Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 11:17

>>1037
Not until you create a new thread containing links to the best replies in this thread, along with whatever else, topic should be I'm not a racist, but I am… PartⅡ, or something along the lines of that.

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 11:17 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 11:41

>>1039

Albinos are a special exception- that goes without saying. But really the question is: How else did you know they were Indians unless they told you? For all you could've known they were black.

And when I say "Swept up" you have to understand that I don't mean completely relocated, but a vast majority of them were relocated/displaced/pitted against each other- regardless (as well you know) ...because the nature of colonization wasn't "live peacefully with the negroid savages".

Keeping them from their environment, preventing them from the knowledge exchange that whites and more developed countries of the time benefitted from was detramental to the development of the kind of modern intellect you say negroids don't have.

Nevertheless, to say that Africans didn't have writing or civilization is the same old discourse of you saying that Egypt wasn't black. It seems to be equally hard for you admit that with Egypt being the first civilization of its kind- that ancient African culture was the precursor to Egypt.

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 11:41 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 11:46

It is well to note that the ancient Greeks described the way the Egyptians looked to them: "The ancient Greek writers Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus, and Aristotle all testified …that the ancient Egyptians were ‘black-skinned'" (Asante and Abarry 3-4).

Keep in mind that during that time the Greek were dark skinned themselves. Bronzed, like an Arab. Very far from "white" or "anglo". If THEY thought they were "black skinned" then they were more than likely black. And doggishly saying that they weren't just discredits you.

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 11:46 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 12:39 (sage)

>>1045 the Greek were dark skinned themselves.
o rly?  Homer himself describes Hercules as blond.  The ancient Greeks were a pure-blooded Aryan people, blond and blue-eyed.

The Turks colonized them many centuries later and interbred with them until the Greek-speaking people inhabiting Greece today are, genetically, almost entirely Anatolian Turk stock.

There is no evidence--the feverish confabulations of "Black Studies" professors do not count as evidence--that the ancient Egyptian culture was anything but Mediterranean Caucasoid.  Given that they can now do genetic analysis of even mummies, don't you think that if they could prove it, they would be proclaiming it from the rooftops?

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 12:39 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 13:08

>>1047

You are wrong about the Greeks being Aryan, that's just eurocentric nonsense. Greek isn't Aryan, Greek isn't white and it's a tendacy of eurocentrics to lump anyone with light skin into the white race. Even gingers weren't considered "white" until they came over to America.

Secondly, it's a proven fact that Egypt had black pharoahs and this doesn't change the fact that the basis for Egyptian culture is African culture. As more and more is being contributed to Egypt of course whites are going to include Egyptians into "Caucasoids". Of course they're going to claim it's their discovery. It's what you do and it's what eurocentric has done every since they thought Human's began in Europe.

Do you really think I expected you to say otherwise? There is no evidence that I provide you that you will believe. None what so ever. You'll doubt the validity of even the most peer reviewed and and widely accepted notions if they fly in the face of your eurocentricism. Next you're going to tell me the Mali never mapped out the stars.

There's no debate here. 

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 13:08 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 13:18

>>1047
>>1049
They were racially as they are today minus immigrants from another continent. Egypt was arab, Greece was mediteranean.

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 13:18 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 13:31 (sage)

>>1049
PROTIP:  making the claim "it's a proven fact" does not in and of itself consitute proof, or even a compelling argument.  U FAIL IT, LURK MOAR

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 13:31 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 14:39

>>1033 No, it's not a give in and that's what you simply refuse to admit. It's conjecture. Either you have proof that skin color/features and IQ tie-in genetically or you don't. Do you have that proof? If you don't, you have no argument.

For one thing, it has nothing to do with skin color or features, it has to do with common genetic stock leading to common features being expressed.  All this intentional bullshit, how you intentionally misconstrue our arguments to say stupid shit like "black skin makes someone dumber" is really quite infuriating.

For the refuation of this argument, I'll point you to an earlier post where I wrote about the Ashkenazim. Because I think it'd be more work to dig that post out, I'll just reiterate it here... 

They actually have records of the ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews being more successful in reproduction based on their intelligence, and now they have the highest IQ of any group in the world.  In addition, they have many extreme genetic abnormalities, mostly relating to nerve conductivity, and the thickness of the myelin membranes surrounding axons.  Their nervous systems are turbo-charged.

Also, your complete and utter butchery of the science of genetics is infuriating as well.  Genetics only exist in groups for you when there's no reference to the way those genes may affect behavior. 

Even if race is defined socially, it doesn't mean that there's no biological component there.  Black parents don't spontaneously produce a white child, or vice versa.  The way you argue I'd almost believe you think that's the way things are.

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 14:39 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 14:56 (sage)

>>1055
I am well aware of the Ashkenazim and their genetic distinctiveness, particularly as it regards neurobiology and measurable enhancements to their intelligence.  You do realize that by even mentioning this, you lend support to my arguments and completely destroy your own, don't you?

Weren't you the one who just finished claiming that all humans were genetically identical, race does not exist, and genetics play no part whatsoever in intelligence or anything else?

U FAIL IT, LURK MOAR

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 14:56 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 15:00

loll

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 15:00 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 15:06

>>1047
Why don't black studies PROFESSORS count? If anything their opinion should mean the most since its their fucking job to know about Black History and achievements and have spents a ton of fucking time researching it.

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 15:06 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 15:07

>>1057
Oh my god... There must be more than one other person arguing alongside me.  Because at times you seem pretty smart, and at other times you seem like acomplete retard.

BTW:  USE THE OTHER THREAD.  THIS ONE IS GETTING ANNOYING.

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 15:07 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 15:16

>>1053

Like I said. Even if I showed you concrete proof, studies done by professors in the field, studies done by experts on Africa you're just going to claim it's Afrocentric. What exactly would be the point in doing something so futile? After all, you could always look it up on google yourself all you have to do is type "Black Egypt", "Black Pharaohs" into the empty field.

>>1055

Ashkanazi Jews sexually selected for intelligence because their culture (environment) told them to do so. This was said before and smashed the arguement then and it smashes the argument now.

Yet Again: Find me the black and white genes. If you don't have a genetic marker backing up your claims, you have no proof.

No proof, no merit, so noted. :D

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 15:16 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 15:21

USE THE OTHER THREAD./

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 15:21 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 15:29

>>1067
why even bother. the whole of /pol/ is pretty much the race thread

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 15:29 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 16:46

This thread has over 1000 niggers.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 16:46 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 17:07

>>1069
>>1071
Proof that niggers are stupid.

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 17:07 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 17:09

reply

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 17:09 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-26 23:59

>>1000 Fuck you,you post stealing dickface.I wanted to post number 1000.GET!!

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-26 23:59 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-27 15:00

>>1077
I hoped I could get 1000 get and reply: I HATE NIGGER

Thread closed

Name: Over 1000 Thread 2006-03-27 15:00 Over 1000

This thread has over 1000 replies.
You can't reply anymore.

Newer Posts