I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>1033 No, it's not a give in and that's what you simply refuse to admit. It's conjecture. Either you have proof that skin color/features and IQ tie-in genetically or you don't. Do you have that proof? If you don't, you have no argument.

For one thing, it has nothing to do with skin color or features, it has to do with common genetic stock leading to common features being expressed.  All this intentional bullshit, how you intentionally misconstrue our arguments to say stupid shit like "black skin makes someone dumber" is really quite infuriating.

For the refuation of this argument, I'll point you to an earlier post where I wrote about the Ashkenazim. Because I think it'd be more work to dig that post out, I'll just reiterate it here... 

They actually have records of the ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews being more successful in reproduction based on their intelligence, and now they have the highest IQ of any group in the world.  In addition, they have many extreme genetic abnormalities, mostly relating to nerve conductivity, and the thickness of the myelin membranes surrounding axons.  Their nervous systems are turbo-charged.

Also, your complete and utter butchery of the science of genetics is infuriating as well.  Genetics only exist in groups for you when there's no reference to the way those genes may affect behavior. 

Even if race is defined socially, it doesn't mean that there's no biological component there.  Black parents don't spontaneously produce a white child, or vice versa.  The way you argue I'd almost believe you think that's the way things are.