I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>92
their countries, their cultures were still somewhat unified.

China? Unified? Singapore? Unified? South Korea? Bah. Even India, with their problems, is doing a lot better than Africa.

For example when Japan was trying to catch up to Western technologies- Africa was still very much colonized.

So what? Explain Singapore then. Used to be some pissant fishing village before investment and endless construction turned it into a first-world trading power. China wasn't exactly trying to catch up with the West either, and they got carved up by Western powers. What about Russia? The sure were backward at the start of this century.

It's still very arrogant and intellectually dishonest for you to assume that South Africa "worked" for native Africans.

Oh? Is it now? They were employed, had free medicine (by some of the best doctors in the world no less), and had a low crime rate. Their housing beat what was available elsewhere in Africa by a mile. In pretty much every metric, SA owned the rest of Africa as a place to live for the blacks, even if it wasn't heaven. Look at the current state. Compared to the rest of Africa then, and all of Africa today, it sure "worked".

And how do you die of starvation in Zimbabwe? Since most the workers were black anyway, all they had to do was keep doing the same work they used to. But no, nobody is doing anything and now there's no food. How do you die of starvation in such a fertile land?

As a particularly ignorant white person,

Ah, just the way to convince me! Keep it up, Mr. Know It All! Every time you don't get your way, you start slinging around poorly-hidden barbs (or your completely juvenile rants, like in >>66 or >>91).

Don't like what I wonder? Then resolve this to my satisfaction. Don't like that I wonder? What a hypocrite.