I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>81

Very simple. Around the time that these cultures took their leaps into Modernism. They were not still under colonial rule and more importantly- their countries, their cultures were still somewhat unified.

One thing you have never seen (and more like, never will see)- is a "Unified" Africa. For example when Japan was trying to catch up to Western technologies- Africa was still very much colonized. And Africa has remained politically, culturally and socially "colonized" in a sense- until, oh say, the last 40 or 60 years of the 20th century.

Japan, Greater Asia and the places you mentioned did not have to deal with the practice of the Aparthied. Now, I can conceed to African culture being abject to modernism- but only as a consequence of colonialism. Africa has never been "left alone" to grow culturally, by their own terms to decide as a people to better themselves FOR themselves and to eventually unify. This is why you still have tribes and their old hatreds. 

As a particularly ignorant white person, I don't expect you to look at what "worked" in African terms. It's still very arrogant and intellectually dishonest for you to assume that South Africa "worked" for native Africans. That's why the Apathied system was thrown out in the first place...because what "worked" for white men was Africans being treated as second class citizen in their own homeland.

The cultures that you meantioned were NEVER forcibly uprooted from their culture and their society- from their homes in the name of slavery. It took Japan and China hundreds (300-400) years to "catch up".

Africa is STILL subject in many ways to being used and abused by the west. No matter what you say or believe the US has not been paying attention to Africa- simply because they have already raped the land of it's natural resources.

The only reason (besides the terrorist reason) that we're looking for stability in the middle east is because they have a  majority of the oil- outside of our stockpile. If there was no U.N, if none of the World Wars had happened- I can assure you we'd see a VERY similar situation in Middle East as was the situation in Africa 200 years ago.