Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Denver!

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-03 22:31

So denver colorado has now legalized marijuana....i cant wait to see how this pans out.... :)

DISCUSS

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-03 23:00

about time someone did.  marijuana's no more harmful than alcohol and tobacco, and those are considered fine-diddly-dandy by pretty much everyone.

as far as i'm concerned, they should either all be illegal, or all be legal.  no halfsies.

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-03 23:09

yea, this is exciting. i thought it was going to take much more time for legalization to begin to happen. i really do hope the crime/drunkdriving/alcohal fuled violence rates drop, so maybe other cities, or even STATES can get the idea and begin to follow in denvers noble footsteps.

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-04 0:18

Similar measures have already passed in Seattle and I believe, San Francisco.

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-04 0:27

>>4
Wow really? The media must have done the same thing they are doing with this case, not covering it at all for fear of being shut down or planting a seed of revolution in their citizens minds...
But the seed needs to be planted. We have been lied to for so long about the "consequences of marijuana use" starting with DARE brainwashing us as children to basicly not even TALK to these "tainted drug users" and then the government spouting propaganda "proven" by botched science left and right. Rawr....
Im glad that truthful information is being released, and the PEOPLE are finnaly getting a say in these laws, like the constitution says we are supposed to. This is truely a happy time for America, and for once I can happily say....."God" bless us.

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-04 2:56

What in the fucking hell!  This is the third story I've heard about on /pol/ first before even CNN or Fox News, and I subscribe to CNN's worthless podcast!

What the fuck is going on with the media?

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-04 2:57 (sage)

>>5

you're annoying.  be quiet.

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-04 3:06

>>6

well, I got it from the aforementioned lazy man's news sources in the first place.

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-06 2:08

>>7
Im sorry im telling you things you dont want to hear.......

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-06 2:19 (sage)

>>9
It's not that you're saying something which is inaccurate.  It's that you're saying it in the most annoying possible way.  You flatter yourself that I'm annoyed with what you said when in fact I'm annoyed with how you said it.

Name: Anonymous 2005-11-07 1:20

>>10
Sorry then...
But how was what I said annoying?

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List