>>9
oh god u just owned that guy so hard that my monitor dimmed for second there
its trendy to bash the whining minority... every day whining on your tv set...
media perceptions are really all that really matter
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAWWWWW~~#@!!12%</dean - od'ed on prozac pandering to his core audience, oh sorry those are national cameras>
the current global climate favors the right, the right is percieved as the party of strength.. in america or anywhere else.. germany is also shifting very right as most of the world is, they want a god-ordained furher to lead them to victory, er i mean defend them
and forget about the gimmick issue of gay marriage.. dean has a very left position on that, i mean shit vermont may as well be france
dean had no chance in a national election, but he knows politics and has a brain, after all he went to yale with with the bushes and rev pat robertson... medical school too...
yale must be a cool place guys
dean was forced to pander to his base, left wing voters... but if hes not out wasting time marketing himself to the media, he can probably be just as effective a dnc chairman as anyone else... he sees clearly the corruption in the beurocracy and will leverage and operate within it as best he can(given the cards dealt to him) the rnc chairman has this same ability and operates the same way, just his hand contains much better cards at the moment
politicans are all the same on an operational level, the only difference is the party lines that they convey in their public rehetoric.. aside from that, and the "pet issues" that they champion indivudually, they are just tools of the party for brute force voting purposes
the actual control is in party hands, and the coordinating faction in the dominant administration(of which many are not actually working in the white house) karl rove gets attention because he is obviously on the payroll and handles the media image of the party.. but people like james baker are off quietly making phone calls whenever they need to assert an opinion on certain matters of expertise.. there are various key people who contribute to party tactics and strategy '*nc chairman' is an important organizational position but it is more an accountability figurehead than anything else
the position is mostly there so theres an easy answer to "who do we fire for losing the election?" and while the act is mostly to paint public perceptions of "change and improvement" the important contributory voices in the party stay the same for decades regardless of *nc chairman