Pedophilia: nature or nurture?

Have you ever known an ex-pedophile?

>>479
Asian girls do it all the time.Most are smaller than your average western 12 yr old.I had a child size philipino girlfriend last 2 yrs back.She was 26 yrs old.Tight vagina but after a while of sex it became quit loose.

>>481
The issue is the pelvic gap relative to the head of the baby. If they're adult, the ratio is larger. It doesn't matter what their height is.

PS. Asian children also weigh less at birth.

Asians are hot! I want several.

So, how much CP do you guys have and whats your IP?

>>484
Having lots of kids in my neighborhood, I do not need cp.

>>479 478 here.Ah yes,you are absolutly right about pelvic gap.I hadn't thought about that or about it being alright to have sex at that age.I was just trying the perspective of nature and child bearing.Puberty has to pass completly before a child can be birthed.Age 15-16.I guess I am not intelligent enough to know that.479 and 484,you are ridiculous.I hope that the Fbi logged you ip on this site and are tracing the route to your house right now.Expect a visit sometime this year.Even if your joking around.Its not funny.

486 here.Correcting the above.I meant 480 and 485 not 479 and 484.Keep reading the linked numbers insted of Bold on left.

If any study needs to be done its the following;

What is the ratio of child(~16) sex offenders, who have never had sex with any persons but a child, to thoes who are currently having sex or have frequently had sex with same-age parters. (ruling out situations like a 19yr old, we are talking about major age gaps.)


I would tend to believe that the majority of true pedos have never had sex or any major sexual contact with another same age member.
I belive that shit rolls down hill and it starts with sexual 'road blocks' e.g. self esteem > sexual depression > sexual deviancy > some form of 'inappropriate' sexual bias be it pedo, rape, S&M, Homosexual, etc.

>>488
homosexual s&m pedo rape is best

>>489
I am wanking

This thread is long but to answer most posts:

PEDOPHILIA(under 13) != EPHEBOPHILIA(13 and over)
ephebophilia is understandable and common.
DON'T DEFEND KID FUCKERS BECAUSE YOU THINK 15Y/Os CAN BE HOT, IDIOT!
sex != rape. Sex with under 13s = rape
Until you have the right hormones & body size for sex (+ it's consequences = babies) then you can't consent to sex (any sex) because you won't appreciate it one bit. Yes that means that some people will be 13 and some will be at least 18 before they are ready for sex.

Rape is a serious life damaging crime.
1- Adults handle such trauma slightly better than pre-sexual kids or developping sexual teens who may be unable to have a sexual life later
2- Adults have a better chance of fighting back
which is why the punishment is more severe for rape on a child or mentally/physically impaired person.

Possessing child porn is a crime and with good reason:
1- A child was tortured so you could fap. downloading that shit encourages the abusers to make more and others to download it too.
2- A small proportion of CP consumers turn into molesters. A small proportion of cocaine users turn into criminals that's why it's banned.

Who gives a fuck if you like boys or girls? The point is that you will NEVER meet a consenting partner under 13 and that your entire fantasy revolves around an unethical situation: rape.
Don't let the pedo communities delude you with their bullshit. Consent is the line that humanity draws. If you don't have that basic human respect of ethics: you are unhuman and monstruous, a harmful leech on society hence the violent reactions to pedos & rapists.

Pedophilia has many explanations: abuse, mental blockage on an idyllic prepubescent past, fear of dominant adults, need to dominate, lust for innocence or the destruction therof, the dumb idea that kidsex will cure aids, the dumb idea that children are innocent and never cruel, etc... but there are no excuses for consuming child porn, encouraging other pedophiles or acting out on unethical fantasies.

Drawn or fictional child porn is a grey area since the harm is only hypothetical: it is only a step out of many towards actual molestation. Only if studies reveal that a significant percentage of lolikon evolve towards real child porn will it be 'right' to ban it however imposing your shit on non pedos or asking non pedos to be tolerant is asking a bit too much.

Also this thread has a lot of stupidity in between the actual intelligent debate. Ok nothing is sacred but just remember that you might be stroking a sick fuck's ego when you lie about liking boobless little girls.

Possessing child porn is a crime and with good reason:
1- A child was tortured so you could fap. downloading that shit encourages the abusers to make more and others to download it too.
2- A small proportion of CP consumers turn into molesters. A small proportion of cocaine users turn into criminals that's why it's banned.

Who gives a fuck if you like boys or girls? The point is that you will NEVER meet a consenting partner under 13 and that your entire fantasy revolves around an unethical situation: rape.
Don't let the pedo communities delude you with their bullshit. Consent is the line that humanity draws. If you don't have that basic human respect of ethics: you are unhuman and monstruous, a harmful leech on society hence the violent reactions to pedos & rapists.

Pedophilia has many explanations: abuse, mental blockage on an idyllic prepubescent past, fear of dominant adults, need to dominate, lust for innocence or the destruction therof, the dumb idea that kidsex will cure aids, the dumb idea that children are innocent and never cruel, etc... but there are no excuses for consuming child porn, encouraging other pedophiles or acting out on unethical fantasies.

Drawn or fictional child porn is a grey area since the harm is only hypothetical: it is only a step out of many towards actual molestation. Only if studies reveal that a significant percentage of lolikon evolve towards real child porn will it be 'right' to ban it however imposing your shit on non pedos or asking non pedos to be tolerant is asking a bit too much.

Also this thread has a lot of stupidity in between the actual intelligent debate. Ok nothing is sacred but just remember that you might be stroking a sick fuck's ego when you lie about liking boobless little girls.

i like little girls

shoot the pedo fuckers. especially 494. and no i'm not joking.

I like Jessica Alba.

>>500 GET

POAST FARSTER

>500 GET

499GET

WE'RE HALFWAY TO HEAVEN!!!!!!!!

>>492
Why 13?
I know 11 year olds who are more mature mentally, physically, and sexually than certain 20 year olds. If they are aware of their bodies functuality and practicality as a means to bring pleasure to themselves and ones they care about, why not engage in sexual relations? They cannot become a target for paedophiles, for mentally and physically they are not children, they can however be targets for ephebophiles.

Consent is such a conceited issue; we say as a society who can and cannot give consent, this is ironic. If pre-adolescent incest is normal within that society, then recording it wouldn't be abnormal would it, as neither would viewing it.

>>501
puberty, or first menstruation, lol.

>>501 just doesn't want to get in shit for his huge child porn collection.

http://www.glarchive.org/gla/freshpetals/augrev.html
anyone know where i can get a copy of this book?

>>504
omg win!

>>504
OMG is right.

>>1

>>507
thank you for bumping this, I have ordered that book immediately, I thinking it to be very helpful in meeting young ladies that do not gold dig! d(^-^d) I want to find those that are not kogal! I hate kogal, they only take and take but only give sex in return will sex is not everything!!! Perhaps now I meet perfect young girl companion with willmanneredness and correct upbringing? Lets hope so!

>>508
uh...  Jap doesn't know the meaning of the word pedo

>>1
Yes and couple of ex-gays too, as well as one ex-hetero.

>>510
>as well as one ex-hetero.
Thanks to briget, we're seeing more and more of those.

There's no such thing as ex-pedophiles.
The condition is incurable.You have the option of a lifetime in the closet, indulging in illegal activities or chosing to end yourself.

Or you can fap to anime.

Fap to Loli, you mean...

>>512
why would anyone want to be an "ex-pedophile" when kiddyfiddling is so enjoyable? You should see my niece! Boys are fun too! They all love to suck my weenie.

I like little boys, but I don't want to fuck them. I want to be that little boy and get fucked. Am I pedo?

>>515
False pedophile! This is a child molester, as evidenced by the 8 year old language and child-like tone and grammar. I await mocking your appearance on the 8 o'clock news! A real pedo is only outed by his lover or a nation-wide police sting. You are too easy prey to be a real pedo!

>>516
Sexual projection fantasy. Take two boyscout uniforms and a ticket to a gay cruise and call me in the morning.
Can also be seen in guys that watch lesbo porn then express the desire to be the one 'taking it' when the strapon comes out of the box.

What makes a pedo?

Nature and nuture.

Nature gives the potential, nuture brings it out.

>>518
I think it's because you're mexican.

>>495
shoot the pedo fuckers. especially 494. and no i'm not joking.
Reply:
Neither I do joking with you. You're outside his reality and yourself joins at the partnership of the " good people ", of the correct and everyone you're insincere and they seem crazy in the sense of which one crazy man is outside his reality. His reality which you don't accept is which the children have always defined their sexuality and they feel sexual pleasures  not only in-between kids rather which they feel urge sexy toward adult people too and those children can to enjoy as much one relationship with kids as with grown people. This is not dirty , nor is sin , nor horrid , nor is offence as you and his partnership of the " good " sees. Is simply human nature royal. The sex haven't limits of age , is simply sex , pleasure , exhilaration which produce one sexual join of two human beings independent of your age. Is it's a natural process. This is not terrible , nor abusive. Those adjectives were given by the partnership of the insincere as you and a lot of other ( judges , fiscal , police , religious fanatical extremists , advisory home-like , psychologist and psychiatrist , mothers offended and gossipy etc ). They are closing her mind in front of one reality of the sexuality of one child or kid. The royal hurt isn´t the relationship between grown - little boy or kid. The royal hurt is done by the partnership of the " good human beings ", good people when they raise one Scandal TREMENDOUS when they discover this relationships and immediately they raise their voices with indelicacy and with rage and stupor , all hurting which they take , they cause terror and large guilt in the kids and they do that this children think badly about an adult man, that is perverse,is hurting those ideas not be born with the little boy , they are induced by the adult man. so whom injure the little boy is not the pedophile , is the society whom says at the little boy with crying which it was highly bad which that this adult man did with that little boy or kid and that sorrow , rage , stupor , spite which the little boy sees at those grown which they say call oneself " good ", at once you may be , may be these: parents or teachers or police or fiscal or judges or mothers gossipy and insincere , that scenario terrible bring trauma at the mind of the little boy and is one chain in as much as that little boy going to grow resentful toward the grown , it will be the grown resentful of tomorrow unto the pedophile which him he made luxuriate sexually and it will be done one grown as you , as his partnership hypocrite which is against the pedophilia. Lastly , I don´t mind that you have been inferred which I am one real pedóphile. Don´t mind absolutely her toughts. Just I want to say that you're off of the reality sexy of the kids.