>>316
So what if I built a viking longboat?
SO WHAT IF I PREFER TO GET TO WORK THAT WAY?
THAT DOESN'T MAKE ME A PEDO DAMMIT!
...the 12 year old with the iron war club steering it does. >>320
Yeah but.....how does that account for all the ones that are MARRIED? With KIDS?
Doof.
Name:
Anonymous2005-11-02 16:48
the crappy thing about being a pedo is that they always grow up
Is it really that surprising given how many fetishes there are? I mean some people like em old, why not young? Not to mention young is disirable in girls in most people to begin with (just not that young).
I think we should take note that all primate males, during puberty attempt to intercourse with just about ANY female, wether rape or consensual. I don't think pedophilia is even the point here, I think when it comes down to it, people are just sexual. Before the victorian ages girls in general, as long as its not too young (babies) or too old (hags) have been objects of sex, a picture with females or varying ages is just that.
It wouldn't surprise me if there were in fact a lot of pedos, i am pretty sure out of the people i know, a handful must be pedos but obviously aren't telling me. Of course you can't prove there IS because well, no one's gonna tell you they are. So if we've lived for this long and haven't really had a large problem with pedos.. why now?
Of course, the kind of thing tends to scare people (i don't know why), but as long as you're not taking advantage of some kid.. i think we can all relax.
Name:
Anonymous2005-11-07 10:13
>>328
Most people who like kids can also get off to women, the studies suggest. so they just take all that sexual energy out on adults and don't need kids.
A few though, can't get off to women, and they're the ones who cause problems.
>>329
True, we don't need a study to tell us this. Most pedophiles are underage themselves, or just normal men with say, 25 fetishes/preferences instead of 24, and get off to the pedo material once in a while, like most of us do with our fetishes.
I would think that's a very small minority, and even the majority of that minority would never rape a kid in real life. In fact you wouldn't even know, he could be your friend, a family member.. etc.
I think people should calm down about the whole child rape thing, I doubt a pedophile would abuse a kid for the same reason i don't rape a hot girl on the streets just cause I fap to them/want to. Not to mention that almost all pedophiles at least have the control to keep their pedophilia under wraps in public. The people who DO rape others, be it children or not, or any other kind of crime, have clearly made the decision to do so, knowing full well of its consequences. Therefore i think the problem here is that there are people without self control, and not lust, media, thoughts and the like.
Name:
Anonymous2005-11-10 14:37
i think people get turned on when they hear about child rape
Yup. There is nuthin' quite like a 7 year old girl gone wild!
Name:
Anonymous2005-11-16 10:43
>>335
this is why more people should let their young girls take bodybuilding classes... omfg... A combination of all my desires in one female....YES MISTRESS SHIINA, I'VE BEEN SO NAUGHTY, TUG IT HARDER, HARDER, AAAAHHHHHH
oohhh ohhhh oooohhhh we're a third of the way there, CAN WE MAKE IT????AAAAHH-Hahhhhhh....
btw does anyone remember that nazi loli story? yeeeaaaah youknowwhatmtalkin'bout. HOTHOTHOT
I think it is both nature and nurture. Nature simply allows us to be capable of being attracted to children. This doesn't mean we are sexually attracted to children immediately, just that we are capable of becomming sexually attracted through nurture. Of course nature and nurture vary, but their properties are different. In general men are naturally attracted to fertile women and would be attracted to any features that a pre-pubescant girl might share with a fertile woman. Nurturally men are attracted to those they can get into bed easier, which obviously leads on to the immorality of paedophilia as rape. Most of the loli on this site revolves around domination rather than love. I would not class attraction to girls who have begun to show signs of puberty as paedophilia, sex with females who are infertile or who will possibly die during childbirth is abnormal. Girls have been getting married at the ages of 14+ for centuries and sexual attraction to mid-pubsecant females cannot really be defined as paedophilia. However in many societies it has been ranked so as women were expected to bear many children and giving birth whilst not fully developped could cause problems.
Name:
Anonymous2005-11-19 0:09
That is why one should use a rubber when porking children!
Name:
Nelson2005-11-19 1:00
wow
Name:
Anonymous2005-11-19 13:15
Why all the fuss about this subject? This is a healthy activity and fun for both parties. I love to see my manhood in a tight hole- be it oral, anal, etc. How are the brats going to learn if we don't teach them? If it's old enough to bleed, it's old enough to butcher. Har Har Har!
Name:
Nelson2005-11-19 13:17
unusual
Name:
Oahudogger2005-11-20 12:54
I would hope that some of these posts are in jest.
Name:
Anonymous2005-11-20 21:59
But what about lenjre fetish thats something that is sociatal not biological
>If pædophilia is genetic, then how do we deal with it? Eugenics?
>Wonderful idea,
Oh yes! Kill all of the pedos. EXTERMINATE THEM!
Name:
Anonymous2005-11-20 23:56 (sage)
Eh. Hard to hunt them down when the majority of them keep it well locked and hidden from the non-internet public. And more often than not we just end up with a McMartin trial-type scenario (innocent people mistaken for pedophiles).
But hey, better to condemn an innocent man than free a guilty one rite?
Name:
This thread must be bumped!2006-01-06 17:38
Can't be beaten by the niggerlovers, let's get back on track kiddies!
Name:
Anonymous2006-01-06 20:41
Only pedos should be allowed to run for political office.
>>332
Pretty true, I think that the molesters simply lack self control and are very selfish, and the hardcore rapists would just hit up anything since it's power-tripping and about controlling a weaker person.
>>350
But I already cast my vote for Ashley. {rimshot}
>>352
So does this mean we should move the discussion to fchan's alternative board?
Name:
Anonymous2006-01-12 4:00
What the hell, man.
Name:
Chris2006-01-12 4:26
I'm soon to be 19 next month and I know where you're coming from. Most of my friends, all of the six save one, have moved on to college or something else.
Enter Sid and Kati. Long-standing boyfriend/girlfriend duo from way back in middle school. I don't suppose it's wrong to say that they behave like a brother and sister who operate in tandem with each other in every-day life. They're both officially bisexual.
I think you can see where I'm going with this. Both Sid and Kati are 14 or 15. They honestly remind me a whole lot of how I was when I was their age. I love hanging out with them, and it's no joke that because of my age I act as a sort of wizened and experienced operative to them. I tell them all sorts of stuff, from programming languages to pot smoking to sex-ed.
What's really neat is that Kati's is a gigantic loli. She's been taking hormonal birth control for a while now, so her breasts have started to bud, but nothing more. I also failed to say that she's five foot six and i'm six foot one. She's tiny compared to me.
Anyway, the thrust of my entry here is to say that I prefer kids younger than myself, and would certainly date them or find a mate in one.
Still no help for you with the nature-nurture argument, my father is about thirteen years older than my mother. So if I marry a girl that's thirteen years younger than myself, she'd be about five years old right now. Loli city.
Having a desire for girls younger than yourself is a perfectly natural thing. It only really becomes pedophilia in my book if the loli in question doesn't want anything to do with you.