UNICEF to Japan: No moar lolis plz

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/03/11/japan.porn.ap/index.html

apan should ban possession of child pornography and crack down on animated films, comic books and computer games that show children being sexually exploited, UNICEF said Tuesday.

The United Nations Children's Fund said Japan's 1999 child pornography law suffers from serious loopholes that hobble law enforcement and threaten children around the world.

"Forms of child pornography that are banned in other countries but not in Japan ... are still widely available on the Internet and on the street," UNICEF said in a statement.

Japan was widely criticized for the wide availability of child pornography until it passed a special law in 1999. That law was tightened in 2004, and lawmakers are working on new measures to firm it up further.

The law does also not cover images of child pornography in animated films, comic books and computer game software -- products that Japan is a major producer of.

"(As) Japan, known worldwide as an IT and software contents giant, is left uncontrolled, hundreds of thousands of children ... continue to be sexually exploited," the UNICEF statement said.

I cry for all the abused imaginary children.

>are still widely available on the Internet

/r/ said prons

Another day, another "child protection" scheme...

UNICEF are the only ones who should be exploiting children eh?

lines on paper, pixels on screens, bits on disks
Verisimilitude and the tree falling in the forest, the illogic philosophy of the prohibition of objects of the mind

Do UNICEF realize that if they stop faping to cartoons, they might actually go to the outside world and raep some real lolis?

>>7
Of course they don't realize that.  And even after sexual abuse sky rockets they'll deny they were wrong.  They'll shift the blame on to something new, probably standard pornography.  And after that they'll blame saturated fats and ban that shit too.

This is not too much problem for me.(I hate small boobs and flat chests.)
but the real problem is the japanese politicians.
They LOVE prohibition. if it becomes law, the japanese manga and anime will not make difference from avatar the last airbender or other american cartoons what IGNORE COMPLETELY the adult and focus ONLY to the childrens.

But what americans on the 4chan will think if know the orders of implementation of anti child porn law comes from EUA´s govern?

This is not too much problem for me.(I hate small boobs and flat chests.)
but the real problem is the japanese politicians.
They LOVE prohibition. if it becomes law, the japanese manga and anime will not make difference from avatar the last airbender or other american cartoons what IGNORE COMPLETELY the adult and focus ONLY to the childrens.

But what americans on the 4chan will think if know the orders of implementation of anti child porn law comes from EUA´s govern?

Japan is the loli capital of the world.  Their women automatically qualify as loli for the most part since they're so small and cute and eminently fuckable.  Culturally, this cannot be stopped.  Illegalizing such things will only increase their price and bring the Yakuza into it, to rule the game.  People will then DIE for loli.  Is that what you want, UNICEF?

Scientist should just create a deadly infectious disease that affects every human being on the planet but only causes pedos to die a slow and horrible death. Problem solved.

>>12 Was raped by his uncle.

lolololol

>>12
What's a pedo?

Yep

I hate "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" syndrome.
Anytime children are involved, logic gets thrown out the fucking window and it turns into a "BURN THE PEDO" chant.
Fuck UNICEF, if I want to fap to pixels drawn in the form of artificial ten year olds, I fucking will.

inb4 BRBFBI

>>15
Muhammad Pbuh. :-p

>>17
is that you jess?

>>19
Yes, it's me.  Is that you, Dale?  I miss you tragically.

The Annex is fucking awesome.

http://annex.wikia.com

Fucking muslims!

Fucking lolis!  HARD.

I hate the think of the children syndrome too. Its ok to starve them, or bomb them, but its not ok to fapped off too cartoon images of them.

People need to respect other country's cultures, so what if Koreans and Filipinos eat dogs or if Japanese eat whales, they've been doing it for centuries.

Why can't they eat card carrying PETA members. Then everyone would be happy.

>>26
agree we aztecs eat babies so stop judging us please

>>29
agree we jews eat babies so stop judging us please

Fix'd. now gtfo kike.

It's bullshit.
Child pornography is made all over the world. No one single country exceeds another in the production of it.

Japan have child models, and you see magazines and dvds of child models and stuff. It's not pornography.

As for animated stuff? Loli?
I try to push this point as much as I can.
Laws in a majority of countries state that pornography of children and representations of children are illegal. When the term representation comes into play, they talk about sketches.
The fact that loli does not involve any child being abused in any form makes it legal.
There is a difference between sketching and drawing. One requires a reference, the other is created without a reference.
Some states in the US claim that loli holds an artistic value and is therefor protected under a law.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22029072-29277,00.html

This happened some time ago in Australia.
Now, this guy got caught with real child porn along with lolicon, but the main part to read is:
"The cartoons were "not as serious as depictions of real children. No child is being abused," Chief Judge Kennedy said."

The bottom line is, it's frowned upon, but it's not entirely illegal either. You can't get sent to jail for having loli or shota.


Personally, I believe loli and real CP requires a completely different taste in people. I can look at loli, but if I glance at the odd CP pic in /b/ I almost vomit.
Heck, I fap over yaoi but can barely stand watching two real guys getting it on. I know straight guys (seriously) with the old Bridget pic collections.
Anime hentai is just a different kind of material.

Oh, also, this is from a 4channer a year or so ago:

On April 16, 2002, the US Court of Appeals
Ninth Circuit overturned the 1996 Child Pornography Prevention Act, determining that it was unconstitutional because it was too vague. The Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 outlawed any material resembling child pornography, regardless of whether the material was actually obscene or actually involved real children. The ninth circuit appeals court determined that the 1996 act ignored the 1973 Miller vs. California ruling defining the legal status of obscenity, and failed to acknowledge the 1982 New York vs. Ferber ruling on the protection of children from sexual exploitation. In effect, the ninth court's 2002 ruling specified that material which does not violate obscenity laws and which does not exploit real children is protected by first amendment free speech rights. (Allow me to make it clear that the 1996 act and the 2002 decision involve only simulated depictions of child sexuality. Actual child abuse is still very much illegal.)

As a result of the 2002 national ruling, "lolicon," the Japanese artistic depiction of fictional children in sexual situations, does qualify for American First Amendment protection. Legal obscenity is defined as material that "does not have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value." Since lolicon anime and manga is hand drawn art, it does have "artistic value" and therefore doesn't violate the Miller vs. California statute. Because lolicon doesn't involve real children, it doesn't violate the 1982 New York vs. Ferber statute. However, individual examples of lolicon material may violate specific local and state "contemporary community standards" (referring to Miller vs. California). In other words, the general concept of lolicon art is legal in America, but specific pieces of lolicon art may be illegal in certain parts of America, depending on local laws. That's why, for example, Media Blasters released the Kite anime in a heavily censored version, then in a less censored version, then finally in an uncensored edition. Media Blasters progressively tested the waters to see if there would be any legal accusations of Kite containing child pornography.