Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Not Guilty?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-28 1:17

Mom not guilty by insanity in 5 kids' drowning deaths
HOUSTON (AP) - In a dramatic turnaround from her first murder trial, Andrea Yates was found not guilty by reason of insanity Wednesday in the drowning of her five children in a bathtub.

The 42-year-old woman will be committed to a state mental hospital and held until she is no longer deemed a threat. If she had been convicted of murder, she would have been sentenced to life in prison.

Yates stared wide-eyed as the verdict was read, then bowed her head and wept quietly. The children's father, Rusty Yates, who divorced his wife last year, muttered, ``Wow!'' as he, too, cried.

Four years ago, another jury convicted Yates of murder, rejecting claims that she was so psychotic she thought she was saving the souls of her five children -- ages 6 months to 7 years old -- by killing them. That conviction had been overturned.

Outside the courthouse Wednesday, Rusty Yates said, ``The jury looked past what happened and looked at why it happened. Yes, she was psychotic. That's the whole truth.''


Note to self, Blame the devil and your home free.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-28 2:26

>>1
Note to you, learn how to use "you're" and "your" properly so you do not have to go fuck yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-28 2:37

Dude, her husband had her mother in law babysit constantly, cause she openly claimed she was liable to do thing. She knew she was psychotic, and the husband knew she was psychotic. It was a well known fact. She had a window of an hour to drown her kids... the hour between her husband going to work and her mother-in-law arriving to babysit... and in there she drowned her kids crying "anything would be better for them then growing up with me as a parent".... I think psychosis applies here...

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-28 3:13

SILENCE! GUILTY! err.

Name: Brasky 2006-07-28 8:16

She was schizophrenic therefor psychotic. She knew her acts were wrong. She knew when she could get away with ther evil deed to make her husband suffer. It was ruthless and heartless. She knew right from wrong. vedict: guilty. Hinkley gets out now and then. He didn't kill anybody unless reagan was a robot controlled by zionist bush machine. I don't want that evil asshole out ever to harm another child.

Name: skinned baby dinosaur 2006-07-28 10:50

So, the mother DID save her childerens souls, right?

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-29 0:35

Hrm... I wonder why no one thinks how her husband was told and repeated occasions "Do not have more children, do not let her get pregnant again, her post partem depression is getting worse every time and she may pose a danger to you, your children, or herself."

Name: Brasky 2006-07-29 14:39

SCREW YOU. This is absolute garbage. No one deserves to lose one child let alone 5. Just because you and your womyn groups will always blame a man for your issues does not make your statement legit. I REBUKE YOU AND WOULD LIKE TO USE FOUL LANGUAGE WITH YOUR SIMPLE BUTT. You are f'n evil to utter that absolute garbage. FU

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-29 21:48


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List