Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Internet Firms to Step Up Child-Porn Fight

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-28 13:17

NEW YORK — Five leading Internet service providers will jointly build a database of child-pornography images and develop other tools to help network operators and law enforcement better prevent distribution of the images.

lol, fighting cp by building a giant database of it. now how many pedo hackers you think are gonna try to steal that database? or rather, how many pedos on the staff for this project are going to 'accidentally' leak the database? or whatever.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-28 13:22

The FBI already does this.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-28 13:29

>>2
and has had such database for years. This one isn't related though and is obviously bad thing. Probably constitutional violation too(if they're gonna censor it).

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-28 13:44

lack of link and would make sense to have checksums of said imaegs  etc

which simply means change a single pixel per repost and you bring down the government

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-28 17:04

http//www.latimes.com/...

sounds like they checksum the images, then if they find it flowing thru the network, they forward your info to the fbi (well, the 'National Center for Missing and Exploited Children' they say)

anyway >>4 is right too, change a pixel and it won't matter.

it seems quite obvious to me tho that this will have the exact opposite effect that they intend it to have. they want to wipe out existing cp with it, but then decreased supply = increased demand, and won't that just cause more of it to be made, exploiting more children, instead of just keeping the old pix around and not exploiting any new children?

but then of course let's keep in mind that kids are increasingly cutting out the middleman and making porn of themselves, by themselves, so the rate at which that comes out will probably make this whole thing largely irrelevant in the long run

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-28 22:08

Most of those pix are at least 10 years old. I think the kids love showing it off! Too bad there are not more boy sites:-)

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-29 10:29

>>3
Yeah, FBI CP database exists so that images confiscated can be effectively classed as legal or illegal thus making it much faster to determine if what is CP and what is not. It's not even connected on net.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-29 15:42

el fbi se re pajea con todo el cp q tiene

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-29 16:49

http://www.pimpslord.com/index.php?reffer=OG_LOC

Go there to register if you register under my name(which you do automaticlly using that link I get 50 bonus turns)

this game is sick! slap hoez and bitches buy em crack to keep em pleased kill niggaz everywhere claim turf trafic drugs join a cartel of pimps clib to the top and win real cash niggas!

so many upgrades to buy im so addicted!!

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-29 21:23

>>5
Not to mention that viewing CP is not technically crime downloading it is. It would be very dangerous system and lots of innocent people would get party vanned. Just think how many would when CP is posted on /b/.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-29 22:00

>>10
well, if you've viewed it, you must have been in possession of it. i.e. downloading or whatever. to prevent innocent parties like /b/tards from getting in trouble over posted cp however, there's a clause that says that it's a defense that you had three or fewer images in your possesion. i imagine that it exists precisely for these such cases.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-30 10:23

>>11
Cache doesn't count as possession. Read court rulings.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-30 11:57

>>12
lolz, so if i keep my cp collection in my browser cache, i'm okay? win!

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-30 13:28

>>13
Unless someone manages to dig out what you just said. ;) Besides it's not that easy. Only way you could do it so that it can't be noticed is to have gigantic cache of every site you visit. Cache is not your safe storage for CP. It's just that looking at CP is legal(obviously or you'd have to arrest millions) and cache is required for that, so it doesn't count as posession.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-30 13:32

>>14
Cache does actually also count if they can prove that you have intentionally kept it. Point is that typically cache is automatically cleared or cleared manually by people(especially when seeing CP), but that info can be dug out from your HD, but doesn't qualify as evidence as you've deleted it and thus they can't prove you intentionally possessed CP.

Name: Anonymous 2006-07-01 11:55

>>5
This is equivalent if police had cameras in everyone's home and this costs so damn much. We have patrolling police in real life, so why don't have patrolling police on net?

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List