ITT question

If i had chemicals used on me by government employees for torture. does this mean "with me not having any treaties signed" Make it ok for me to do the same?

I dont see any difference ethically from doing threw the air vrs direct approaches such as threw the skin.

They called it war with alkida, like they had territory. and they where alledgedly loyal and brainwashed. so if the people here have simmler effects like as if they where brainwashed. and they are all a threat do to there beliefs and loyalties. An goverment employees are useing chemicals, whats the difference?

The way people relfect the use of the chemicals seem misleading and I see no diffrence. and the way its misleading I would trust alkidas honesty more. I think they see it how it is.

Whats the diffrence with mass death here just like was done over there.

People here have brainwashed like views. If this makes them a threat whats the problem with killing them?

The persistence in beliefs with alkida makes better sense then the ones people have here. Even if some of there beliefs are fundamentally wrong, They still work better.

so god lost the battle sort of.

congress got anthraxed lolololololololollolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol rofl

Other citasins here in the territory use biological assult even if minor, then if reported to the local tribesmen they say theres nothing they can do about it. That its not agenst the law. Then if someone reports you for a accedent you get locked up and crule and unusual punishment.

>>10

then if you dont let them stick chemicals under your skin, they stick you in a unsafe quarantine with people who might have virility attached to them.  Actually i complied agenst my faith and i think they might have done this anyways.