The Jew knows to this day what Hitler and his racial wisdom mean for us. So they attack him with as much lies as possible to not just defame him. But to also defame the eternal wisdom he brought forth, which is the salvation of our People to this day and ever after.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-25 11:46
>>1
And where exactly on that website is any proof "Hitler had Jewish genes"?
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-25 11:51
This is nothing but a load of bullshit propaganda.
Hitler according to some questionable research, belonged to haplogroup E1b1b1.
E1b11 more than likely originated in the Middle East.
The only people in Africa who are going to belong to E1b1b1 are people who are either Caucasians (probably Middle Eastern) or people who are mixed with Caucasian.
Yes, E1b1b1 can be found in Somalia and Ethiopia, but only because these people are mixed with Caucasian.
I seriously doubt E1b1b1 would be found amongst populations of people who are completely Negro.
The person who wrote this article obviously thinks that all Africans are black, well that is just simply not true, Caucasian people have been in North Africa, even before recorded history and Negro people were never native to North Africa.
Considering non-Negro people have always been in Africa people really need to stop associating the word African with being Negro or black.
Looking at the history of the word Africa, it is taken from the name of a province founded by the ancient Romans. It roughly comprised the territory of present-day northern Tunisia, north-eastern Algeria and the Mediterranean coast of modern-day western Libya along the Gulf of Gabès. All of this makes it even more ridiculous that the word today is associated with Negro people.
E1b1b1 is Caucasian, just because it is found in some parts of Africa does not mean that it is Negro.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-25 12:08
Adolf Hitler had no Jewish ancestry, but lots of people are gullible enough to believe it.
Ask anyone who claims he was Jewish to show you evidence, shuts their mouth instantly.
Here's what we know: Hitler's paternal grandmother, Maria Schicklgruber, gave birth to Alois, Hitler's father, in 1837. She was 42 and unmarried at the time and apparently never revealed the father's identity. Five years later she married Johann Georg Hiedler (spelling was a bit casual in those days). But Alois kept the surname Schicklgruber until he was 39 years old.
In 1876 a new baptismal certificate was issued declaring that Alois's stepfather Johann Georg Hiedler was in fact his real father. By this time both Maria and Johann Georg were dead. Why the name change so late in the day nobody really knows, but there is speculation that Alois did it so he could come into an inheritance. At any rate, most researchers today believe Johann Georg Hiedler was really Alois's father.
Now for the weird stuff. After the war Hitler's former lawyer, Hans Frank, claimed that Adolf told him in 1930 that one of his relatives was trying to blackmail him by threatening to reveal his alleged Jewish ancestry. Hitler asked Frank to find out the facts. Frank says he determined that at the time Maria Schicklgruber gave birth to Alois, she was working as a household cook in the town of Graz. Her employers were a Jewish family named Frankenberger, who had a 19-year-old son. The son, according to Frank, was Alois's father and Hitler's grandfather-which would make the man who inspired the alleged Holocaust one-quarter Jewish.
Frank's allegations have vexed historians ever since. The distinguished Hitler scholar Werner Maser was so irritated he claimed Frank made the whole thing up. Others think Frank was telling the truth but that the research he did for Hitler was faulty. It turns out that all Jews had been expelled from Graz in the 15th century and were not allowed to return until the 1860s; what's more, so far as can be determined, Maria Schicklgruber never lived in Graz. Frank's source for the Frankenberger yarn was a distant relation of Hitler's, who supposedly had letters exchanged by the Frankenbergers and Maria Schicklgruber. (It's claimed they gave her child support.) But neither the relative nor the letters have ever surfaced, and chances are it's all a crock of shit.
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-25 12:14
Wait, I thought race wasn't a valid scientific construct? What's its going to be, race doesn't exist, or non-white racial ancestry can be determined even in individuals with overwhelmingly white characteristics?
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-25 12:15
The article is using a racialist argument (He had non-White DNA) to attempt to discredit racialism. What's non-White DNA? Isn't race just skin color? This is a typical tactic, you see articles that say "Race is a social construct, ethnic groups are biologically identical" and then you see other articles stating, "Mixed race people are genetically healthier, smarter, and taller," so on and so forth. In other words, playing both sides of it.
Make no mistake the real purpose is to discredit his ideology, the people writing these articles couldn't care less about Hitler's genetic profile, it's his ideology they're trying to discredit. The ideology of having a Government that represents it's people. IE American foreign policy represents America rather than Israel. American immigration policy represents America rather than Mexico. America's economic policies and monetary system represent America's people rather than big banks and guys with names like Greenspan, Bernanke, and Blankfein. They couldn't care less about Hitler's genes, it's just a means to an end.
Of course, the ideology they're discrediting (Kill everyone who doesn't have blonde hair, exterminate all the Blacks, everyone in the world should be German) wasn't his real ideology in the first place, so that's a lie too.
They claim he was this maniac who wanted everyone in the world to be 100% White, and then they're saying, "Well he himself was only 99% White" thus his own ideology discredits itself, and that's the real intention here. It's like setting up a strawman and then knocking it down. But both the strawman and the toppling of the strawman are lies.
A) Hitler didn't want to eliminate Jews, he wanted them out of his borders because he viewed them as a powerful influence that was working contrary to the interests of the German people.
Hitler granted many people of mixed German/Jewish ancestry citizenship with a few restrictions (no working for newspapers or Government). If he was a mass murdering maniac why would he let people who were part Jewish live their lives? It's completely contradictory.
B) There's absolutely no evidence Hitler wanted to eliminate Black African people. Yes he viewed them as being more impulsive and having lower intelligence. Guess what, so do most of the almost 7 billion Human beings on planet Earth. If that were a crime mankind would all be jailbirds, including most of the people living in Israel. Israel maintains some of the harshest most racist immigration policies in the world. You have to have Jewish ancestry to get in there, even if you're married to a Jewish spouse it's difficult to get through all the red-tape, take it from Alex Jones.
C) I don't have any compelling reason to believe this "study," since the whole article is dripping with preconceived bias (Race doesn't exist, Whites are evil, Jews are great, Hitler was Black, the world is flat).
D) Even if the study is hypothetically true, having this genetic material would not make Hitler a Jewish man or a Black man.
"The comparison also showed that Jews have successfully resisted having their gene pool diluted, "
Oh so now we are talking about gene pools being diluted and not "enriched" or "diversified"?
FUCK THE BBC
Name:
Anonymous2011-09-25 17:51
Race exists then stops existing depending on when it's convenient and who it benefits.