Name: Anonymous 2011-01-14 0:46
Hey.
So, I've been thinking about how the imageboards and the (apparently unmoderated) text BBS are run. It's all in the moderators' and administrators' hands.
But what if we changed that? What if we simply took an anonymous BBS with modifications that allowed users to be largely auto-moderating?
Suppose that each post has three buttons available for users, delete, delete + ban, ban. Each of them has a different voting threshold. I.e., for a deletion, you'd need like ten votes for removal, for a ban twenty. The ban count will be kept for each ID over multiple posts. Delete + ban would add one to the posts' delete count and one to the ID's ban count. Note that these counts time out after two hours, so that there's no way to abuse the system by going on a "deletion" spree, kicking all the ancient one-from-deletion posts off or ban dynamic IPs that have long changed.
What do you think about this? Implementing that wouldn't be too hard looking at kareha.
So, I've been thinking about how the imageboards and the (apparently unmoderated) text BBS are run. It's all in the moderators' and administrators' hands.
But what if we changed that? What if we simply took an anonymous BBS with modifications that allowed users to be largely auto-moderating?
Suppose that each post has three buttons available for users, delete, delete + ban, ban. Each of them has a different voting threshold. I.e., for a deletion, you'd need like ten votes for removal, for a ban twenty. The ban count will be kept for each ID over multiple posts. Delete + ban would add one to the posts' delete count and one to the ID's ban count. Note that these counts time out after two hours, so that there's no way to abuse the system by going on a "deletion" spree, kicking all the ancient one-from-deletion posts off or ban dynamic IPs that have long changed.
What do you think about this? Implementing that wouldn't be too hard looking at kareha.