Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

So much for evolution, sciencefucks

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 15:26

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ml_israel_ancient_teeth

The current theory of evolution might not be 100% correct.

Therefore, the bible must be 100% correct. If you don't have all the answers to everything like religion does, why should I switch to science.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 15:29

Humanity is 400,000 years old?  That proves it!  The earth is 6,000 years old!

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 15:55

cool logic bro

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 16:12

Diamonds and rubies take "millions of years to form naturally" yet scientists can create perfect synthetic copies in laboratories.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 16:27

>>2
The dating methods aren't accurate or even remotely close to accurate. Until you can show several items that show that radiometric dating can show same dates from different dating methods that isn't just Argon dating methods creationists can still argue that point.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 16:29

Data is subject to interpretation. It's the Darwinist faggots who are unscientific.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 16:30

>>6
Yeah well why hasn't anybody presented credible evidence on this?

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 16:30

>>7
They have provided credible evidence but the Darwinists have political and economic power and censor evidence that doesn't adhere to their twisted view on how anatomically modern humans came to be.

Name: Alpha Male !KBgk.53lJg 2010-12-28 16:46

This thread could use about 60 more IQ points. It appears very autistic as-is.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 17:06

So much for evolution! LOL. Man began in Israel. They found Noah's arc last year and now this! It sure seems GOD is saying something these days . Maybe wake up!

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 17:13

>>1
The theory is correct, the evidence can change. And it's just a bunch of teeth until now.
Actually it's gonna be more lulz later, because the picture which is emerging now with all the discoveries seems to show that there might be a biological basis for races after all.. We already know Africans lack the Neanderthal genes.. This is important. Neanderthals were more advanced than our species when they first met. It might explain why non-Africans went on to develop so much in Europe, Asia and Pacific, whereas Africans largely remained backwards. So, I don't see how this would refute evolution and support creationism.. On the contrary, it brings more evolutionist lulz to the table. I think eventually they will discover that Africans are a different species, which many already suspect.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 17:22

Evolution is a theory. A questionable one at that. To believe in evolution 100% is almost as bad as being religious.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 17:22

>>10
Israel? The Biblical and archaeological location of Noah's Ark is in modern day Turkey near the Armenian border.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 17:25

Definition of EVOLUTION
1 : one of a set of prescribed movements

2 a : a process of change in a certain direction : unfolding
  b : the action or an instance of forming and giving something off : emission
  c (1) : a process of continuous change from a lower, simpler, or worse to a higher, more complex, or better state : growth (2) : a process of gradual and relatively peaceful social, political, and economic advance
  d : something evolved

3 : the process of working out or developing

4 a : the historical development of a biological group (as a race or species) : phylogeny
  b : a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations; also : the process described by this theory

5 : the extraction of a mathematical root

6 : a process in which the whole universe is a progression of interrelated phenomena

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 17:26

>>14

Liberals and Darwinists are incapable of winning a debate through logic and science so they use "semantics" and "equivocation" and they exploit the various definitions of evolution to "win" their arguments.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 17:37

this thread needs abortion

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 17:37

>>12
no it isn't

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 18:56

>>17
Of course it is.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 19:05

............._
............/..\
.........._|..|__
......@|_.0.0*_|@...___________________________________ |||
...........|.0*=====[IMA FIRIN' MAH LAZOR!! BLAAAAAAAAAAAH] ----- <> |||
_______|..|*_______ |||
|_|___./..|..\____|_|
/...\...|...|...|....../...\
|...|../..|.|...\ ....|....|
.\/\/.|...|...|...|....\/\/
...._/...|.....|...\_
../____|.....|____\
....| |............| |.....0......0........0......0
....vv............vv.....0O0..0O0....0O0...0O0
__________________|____|_____|____|_

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 19:45

Which evolution?

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 19:51

>>20
Pensi

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-28 20:06

>>21
You mean Penski? Like in the Penski file?

lol that George is such a funny tubby! He is sooo lazy!

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List