Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

inter-racial couples

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 23:27

I think inter-racial couples deserve to be killed on site. The thing is, whenever one decides to kill such a couple, they must kill the non-white MALE first. If they kill the white female first, the non-white male runs away too fast to get!

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 23:53

Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 2:25

>>2
wat

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 2:51

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 3:15

>>4
lol, that last bitch got a moustache!

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 3:27

>>1
What about if the male is white, knucklehead?

Everybody knows race mixing is the best!

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 3:33

>>6
Indeed, it is the mixing of Homo Sapiens with Homo Neanderthalensis that has made Eurasians superior to Negroid Africans who are currently still less evolved.

Name: Typical Librul 2010-12-24 7:29

>>4
Bubububbut I thought race mixing only happened between white women and black men?????? What is this??????

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 7:42

>>4
white man and asian slut is an acceptable pairing. The rest are various types of sub humans mating amongst themselves - no whites involved. Therefor, no butthurt occurred.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 9:38

>>7,9
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 1:30

>>7
Actually, whites were the less evolved and mixed with blacks (whites were neanderthals). It's true, so stick that in your pipe and smoke it buster!

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 1:39

>>11
No.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 1:41

>>12
That's quite a good rebuttal there, chief.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 1:44

>>13
Thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 1:47

>>4

I bet the Asian parents are sooooo happy about this. lol.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 1:48

>>13
whites were Neanderthals
They weren't. Neanderthals had white skin but they aren't the ancestors of white homo sapiens at all. Totally different species.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 1:48

>>14
I was being sarcastic. Just simply "no" is not an acceptable counter-argument. Making >>11 have the upper hand, unless you can come up with something, which I doubt.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 1:49

>>15
Why wouldn't they be? At least the ones who are with whites.

Name: 13 2010-12-25 1:50

>>16
I didn't author post >>11 by the way.

Name: 12,16 2010-12-25 1:56

>>19
I didn't author post 14 either. Now I'm sort of confused.

Name: 21 2010-12-25 6:22

>>21
I didn't author post >>21

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 6:35

>>21
Me either.  one of us is lying.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 6:37

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 6:40

If environment creates race why aren't Eskimos blond haired, blue eyed, and pale skinned? Why aren't Arabs black? They get much more sunlight than Negroes.

Face it, we whites aren't white due to vitamin D or UV radiation. We are white because we're better.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 7:08

>>24
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 7:10

It's sad that even on Christmas, we have ignorant far right-wingers posting their garbage.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 7:42

>>26
Christmas is the most important holiday of the Christian religion, the most ignorant and right wing religion ever created by white men to repress women and ethnic minorities, so it is no surprise that Christians spread their hatred on this day too.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 8:38

HAPPY CRIMBLEBAS

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 8:59

>>27
I consider Christmas a secular holiday nowadays. It's funny how Christians used to have a war against Christmas a little over a hundred years ago, now they're mad at us for "taking" their holiday.

Besides, Christianity has become a religion with adherents made up of all kinds of races, colors, and creeds. Doesn't make the religion any less fucktaded though.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 14:29

>>27
It was created by nutbag Jews who resented the authority of the Empire.  That's like the opposite of right-wing, genous.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 15:06

>>27
Christmas is the most important holiday of the Christian religion
That'd be Easter, bro.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 15:11

>>30
It was created by nutbag Jews who resented the authority of the Empire.
Nonsense. There's a passage in the Bible that specifically states to "Render unto Caesar". That's pretty pro-empire if you ask me.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 15:11

>>30
The Roman Empire was a source of progressiveness, it was followed by 1000 years of anti-intellectualism which we now call the Dark Ages. And the Dark Ages ended when people started rediscovering the works of the ancient Greeks and Romans. This is what we now call the Renaissance (rebirth).

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 16:25

The Middle Ages were the real "Age of Reason". The "Enlightenment" yielded only tyranny and war.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 17:06

Know the history of your race

http://www.white-history.com/

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 0:16

>>32
No, that passage is about keeping your debts to god and state separate.  Read the whole original paragraph.

>>33
It was a fucking Empire, geniouis.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 5:08

>>36
So what if it was an empire? The British Empire was also progressive.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 13:04

Nobody is offended when someone says "all white people are lazy, stupid, ugly, and good for nothing". Why? Because it's obviously a lie.

Yet people are "offended" when we call coons lazy, retarded, ugly, and point out they've never invented anything. Interesting.

The lie does not offend. The truth offends.

You figure it out.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 15:04

>>38
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 15:06

>>38
Not all, but I sure do know some white people who do fit that category.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List