Honestly. Most loungers are straight edge kids who think that one puff from a joint will kill you, and one line of meth will turn you into a raping werewolf who goes around and rapes gingerbread men with his tiny one inch dick and then steals your tv. Yet we discuss drugs constantly, which are always filled with annoying trolls trying to preach to us that drugs are bad. Given the personalities on this board, /lounge/ isn't exactly the best place to have serious discussion on drugs.
Now, you are probably thinking "Why?". When you should be thinking: "Why not?". Think about it, textboards take up little to no space as it is all just textfiles and php pages. You are not bloating up the server to add one extra board, and even if it isn't the most active board it would still probably beat other boards on this site such as ?carcom? and ?tele?.
What other drug textboards are there? I believe there is a drug board in 2ch, however it is all in nipnog language and I can not understand it. 420chan used to be a cool place to discuss drugs, but it has turned a little bit too much like 4chan for my tastes. I think a ?drug? board would be a FANTASTIC addition to world4ch.
Please consider my request, even though nobody important will ever read this.
Happy druggin"1
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-23 22:14
There will be so much trolling there.
Name:
fart man2010-12-23 22:19
>>@
There would be more trolling in a drug discussion in this board then there would in an isolated board.
Anyway, just keep this thread drug related so you can at least have this thread to stop bitching.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-24 0:00
drugs are against the law for most of us. it would be liek having a board about speeding or not stopping to a complete stop at stop signs.
Name:
fart man2010-12-24 0:26
>>%
Surely you can understand that most drugs shouldn't be illegal in the first place. If you must argue, there are tons of laws being broken on 4chan all the time, it wouldn't really matter if we talked about drugs.
Name:
!L33tUKZj5I2010-12-24 1:58
>>4
There's always the thread in /vip/, the if you are high one.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-24 5:42
>>6
Any disgusting meth chicks gobble your tiny knob for another hit lately?
Name:
fart man2010-12-24 10:40
>>*
The fact that there are rude posts like this proves my point that drug discussion won't work in ?lounge?.
And no, I don't prostitute myself for meth. Nor would I give away my hard earned meth for a blowjob.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-24 10:49
Drugs are bad mmmmmmkay.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-24 12:56
Uh, I don't consume any "drugs" except caffeine because I study theoretical physics; I'm intelligent and happen to need all the mental powers I can muster.
And don't tell me to take LSD or DMT or SHROOMS. My visual-spatial and metaphorical abilities are already far beyond what any of you clannish deadheads could muster, high or otherwise.
>>11
Sagan got his best ideas when he was stoned, bitch. Read "Marihuana Reconsidered."
Name:
Alpha Male!KBgk.53lJg2010-12-24 20:00
>>13
Firstly, Sagan wasn't a theoretical physicist. He didn't need his mind all that much.
His ideas aren't by any means original; science fiction had existed long before he started publicising the romance of science. Don't get me wrong, however. I thoroughly enjoy his style and even thought Contact was a good read. But do you really think he revealed anything that the average layman could have read in any little paperback gem from the likes of Heinlein, Clarke, Asimov or Pohl, to name a few? Said layman would never pick up one of these books whose covers alone crazily illustrate some faraway fantasy. Sagan is, in short, accessible.
I find it humorous that not only did you not explain for me any of the supposed effects induced by pot smoking which would make one an instant Carl Sagan, you also saw fit to cite an entire book in order to get your point across, rather than any of its possible excerpts. And a little evidence would be nice, but in this case I'd even accept a rehashing of what you may have picked up from your own experience.
But that's probably too much to ask, seeing as how nearly every stoner on the planet seems to instantly lose whatever inclination towards structured introversion they had to begin with.
Your move.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-24 20:14
>>16
It's not a book, it's a short essay by Sagan.
Anyways, I should have known you were Alpha Male, but now that I know for sure I have nothing to say except "please leave."
Name:
fart man2010-12-24 21:30
>>!!
Stimulants such as Methamphetamine, Dextroamphetamine, Caffeine, Nicotine, and Cocaine have all been proven to increase brain activity, focus, and creativity. There is a reason college kids take D-Amp to help study and pass tests.
Myself, I find that methamphetamine does the best job. It helps clear my brain of distractions, causes INTENSE focus, and helps me become more creative and helps me flow with ideas. Of course methamphetamine has the worst reputation of all drugs so if people ask you what you are on, just say Adderall.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-24 21:36
>>17
Do you make your own meth? If so, would you recommend Secrets of Methamphetamine Manufacture by Uncle Fester?
Name:
fart man2010-12-24 21:41
>>!*
I do not. I buy my meth from a trusted friend who is also a biochemist. I am pretty sure the Uncle Fester book is often spoken highly of and I'm sure it works fine.. Only problem the main ingrediant to amphetamine is Pseudoephedrine. Good look trying to get pseudoephedrine in modern times.
>>19
You can get it at any grocery store, it's just getting industrial quantities of it that's tough.
Name:
fart man2010-12-24 23:05
>>@)
That is not a failed cite, nor is it a reason to return to /b/. I haven't been to /b/ since 2006.
>>@@
You can't just get psuedoephedrine at a store, they have to write down your details and the ammount you are buying. Even if it is just a single box. It's very hard to get the ammount of pseudoephedrine required to make a small dose of meth nowadays. I might move to Canada or some other country where pseudoephedrine is easier to get a hold of.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-24 23:16
>>22 That is not a failed cite
Yes it is, as it not done properly. If it were not a failed cite, you would have put >>20. You're doing this to be an attention whore, don't kid yourself.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-24 23:17
>>22
Hey, how come you didn't stay in the IRC channel? People wanted to talk to you, but you left. :(
>>25
No I'm not, because I don't cite posts in some weird way like a fucktard starved for attention, nor do I use a name or tripcode. He could just use a tripcode and that would be good enough to make known one's presence. It's blatant attention whoring, period, paragraph.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-25 0:00
>>28
It is attention whoring, no more so than anyone else who uses a name or trip though. You might not cite posts like a fucktard but you still make the same meticulous "failed cite" post like a fucktard all the time, which makes you an attention whore. At least fart man writes interesting posts, not like your dumbfuck spamming.
Besides, you're just fucking wrong. If you want to call out name/tripfags for being attention whores then do that. He's posting exactly what he intends to, there's no failure in his cites.
>>@#
I decided to cite like this after reading a thread proposing this idea to cite posts like this from now on. I thought it was a pretty neato idea but apparently everybody else thought it was stupid and the idea didn't last. "fart man" was also an idea I saw in a thread that suggested that the default name of anonymous be changed to "fart man". I'm not really attention whoring as I post anonymously more then 3/4 of the time. I just happen to use the "fart man" persona in special occasions.
>>@$
I would have loved to stay in the IRC. I stayed in there for an hour and saw no activity so I idled in there for awhile. I eventually left my house for the night and when I came back I saw that my router had gotten mistakenly unplugged and I was disconnected.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-25 0:27
>>27 He's posting exactly what he intends to, there's no failure in his cites.
Not when the board doesn't fucking render them, they are. You might not cite posts like a fucktard but you still make the same meticulous "failed cite" post like a fucktard all the time, which makes you an attention whore.
Ousting him for his own fucktardness, also, you're a moron.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-25 0:31
>>29 I decided to cite like this after reading a thread proposing this idea to cite posts like this from now on. I thought it was a pretty neato idea but apparently everybody else thought it was stupid and the idea didn't last.
Exactly. Glad you admit it's fucking retarded. Why continue to do it?
Name:
fart man2010-12-25 0:39
>>#)
You know what? You may have a point. I will admit that I am citing like this to gain a bit of "attention", but I am not posting like a complete fucktard like some other name/tripfags like LeetUK or Bob. The fact that after nearly every post I make somebody has to post "failed cite" proves that there are obviously people out there trying to get more attention then me, as their posts have no thought put into them at all and are just pointless spam. The "failed cite" posters are no better then the "fuck off, spammer" posters.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-25 0:40
>>30
Yeah, thank God you came along to oust him for his fucktardedness. How the hell did we manage before you came along. Thank you for all of your informative posts because I really need to be reminded that using the symbols above the number key will not render a proper cite in shiichan. What a valuable fucking service you provide.
Name:
fart man2010-12-25 0:40
Let's try to keep this thread on topic. This thread is a debate on whether drugs should be discussed in ?lounge? or not, not a debate on whether fart man is an attention whore or not.
Name:
Alpha Male!KBgk.53lJg2010-12-25 0:42
>>16
It's Christmas, pal. Why not just bend over and let the real man HAXYOUR ANUS?
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-25 1:26
>>32
Not the person you're talking to, but what if, say, you were to start a "ask me something" thread, and you had to cite like 8 or 9 posts at a time? It would become quite a clusterfuck and nobody would know who you're referring to; it would be enormously confusing.
I also use a Greasemonkey script called /b/ackwash reloaded and it's quite useful since any post that is cited will show up as a window when you have the cursor over it; you don't even have to see the entire thread if it's a post that doesn't show up in the latest five on the front page.
That is probably why a majority of the people in the thread that suggested citing posts like that felt it was a bad idea, and for all practical purposes it basically is. If everyone started citing posts the way you do, the board would become quite unusable.
Though, I can't stop you from doing that, it really doesn't make any sense other than "look at me! I do things differently!". I'm no EXPERT PROGRAMMER but that is also probably why posts are labeled as numbers rather than character symbols.
>>33
That's exactly why they're "failed cites", dickhead. You're much more of a moron than I thought.
>>34
Fair enough, but it's still fucking retarded.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-25 6:18
Definition of NIGGER 1 usually offensive; see usage paragraph below : a black person 2 usually offensive; see usage paragraph below : a member of any dark-skinned race 3
: a member of a socially disadvantaged class of persons <it's time for somebody to lead all of America's niggers … all the people who feel left out of the political process — Ron Dellums>
Usage Discussion of NIGGER Nigger in senses 1 and 2 can be found in the works of such writers of the past as Joseph Conrad, Mark Twain, and Charles Dickens, but it now ranks as perhaps the most offensive and inflammatory racial slur in English. Its use by and among blacks is not always intended or taken as offensive, but, except in sense 3, it is otherwise a word expressive of racial hatred and bigotry.
Origin of NIGGER
alteration of earlier neger, from Middle French nègre, from Spanish or Portuguese negro, from negro black, from Latin niger
First Known Use: 1574
The editors of the magazine Continuum consistently denied the existence of HIV/AIDS. The magazine shut down when its editors all died of AIDS-related causes.