Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Libertarians

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 8:00

Libertarians are just radical Right-wingers who have not one care for anything or anyone other than themselves. They are mostly asocial computer nerds who have spent the major portion of their lives sitting in their bedrooms wishing someone liked them.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 9:11

>>1
so?

Name: BlueCream 2010-08-04 9:18

Libertarians? I believe you mean LOLbertarians, OP! The free market won't fix shit. NOW IMAGINE THAT!!!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 18:15

>>3
RedCream will be disappointed in your statist views, yes indeed.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 18:15

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 22:00

To understand what a Libertarian is, fill the mold with the intellectual racism of Charles Murray, the political extremism of Ron Paul, and the nature of Timothy McVeigh.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 22:05

>>6
That doesn't speak for all libertarians though.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-05 16:00

HURRR THE GOVERNMENT IS EVIL
IF WE GET RID OF THE GOVERNMENT EVERYTHING WILL BE GREAT

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-05 18:46

>>8
You're confusing libertarians with anarchists.
Also,
HURRR
Back to the imageboards, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-06 1:13

>>9
same shit different asshole

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-06 1:36

>>10
Not really. Libertarians support at least some form of a state, anarchists call for a complete abolishment of it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-06 21:30

>>11
At least anarchists have more ambition than Libertarians.

That counts for something.

Even though I disagree with them.

The lack of a larger social ambition from Libertarians is juvenile.

Leave me alone you say?

How childish!

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-06 21:38

Anarchism is the most irrational, anti-intellectual notion ever spun by the concrete-bound, context-dropping, whim-worshiping fringe of the collectivist movement, where it properly belongs

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-06 21:40

Objectivism pwns both Libertarians & Anarchists!

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-06 21:57

>>12
Leave me alone you say?
How childish!

That's a childish way of looking at it, since there's more to it than just "wahh leave me alone".

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-06 22:36

>>14
oh dear god

Name: !.vj78umXOw 2010-08-07 2:32

or u culd  jus faceplam urself in2 a spikewall lul.. BLAM brians goes all over u... damu got HEEADSHOTTED!!!1

lol yeaye  im goin bak2 /b/ hush
-----------------------\p\

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-07 2:40

>>17
lol yeaye  im goin bak2 /b/ hush
Precognitive efficiency!

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-07 16:00

The Libertarian Party is much like child pornography, trying to find any redeeming social value in it is problematic.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-08 1:40

Federally activated National Guard troops engaging in law enforcement activities on non-Federal land is a direct violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-08 3:52

T. Alexander Smith in his book, Cultures at War: Moral Conflicts in Western Democracies, from page 30, says “right-wing movements” are “social movements whose stated goals are to maintain structures of order, status, honor, or traditional social differences or values” as compared to left-wing movements which seek “greater equality or political participation”. Far right-wing philosophies include those of Nazism, fascism, and advocate, in simplest terms, societal stratification in the form of segregation. It is no stretch of the imagination to associate the the Bush family with the Nazi Party. The neo-conservative movement is not a subversion of the conservative arm of politics, it is in fact a reassertion of the base tyrannical and extremist tenants of conservatism, the natural inheritor of all things conservative and right-wing.

The strongest vein of political movement in the U.S. over the past 100 years has been socialist and pro-central government.  Libertarians seek to reverse this trend.  Libertarians seek to abolish all governmental enforcement of traditional social differences and values.  In fact, Libertarians are most like the left-wing and least like the right-wing, if you do not understand this, then you do not understand the nature of liberty versus the effects of greater controls through centralized government.

Remember, besides the point that the Nazis were right-winged, they were also socialists.

Any politician who voted for the bailouts are by definition "right-winged", whether you like to believe it or not.  By allowing the continuation of the largest companies in our business/social landscape, they are in effect "maintaining the structures of order" and thereby social stratification.  Why should we expect anything less, these are the people who pay for their campaigns.

Obama, nothing against the man personally, is for greater gun control and the banning of handguns.  He was shared in this sentiment with Hitler.

To quote Howar Bloom in his book "The Lucifer Principle":
"the greatest human evils are not those that individuals perform in private, the tiny transgressions against some arbitrary social standard we call sins.  The ultimate evils are the mass murders that occur in revolution and war, the large-scale savergeries that arise when one agglomeration of humans tries to dominate another: the deeds of the social group."

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-08 15:41

>>21
bit of tortured reasoning there.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-08 18:51

>>22

Please elaborate on the following:
1. How >>21 is "tortured reasoning"
2. How >>22 isn't purely ad hominem for lack of any substantive rebuttal

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-08 19:39

>>21

I can only imagine the atrocities commited when one agglomeration is more than 80% of the population of the planet.

I would hate to be in that 20%...

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-08 22:18

>>21
Any politician who voted for the bailouts are by definition "right-winged", whether you like to believe it or not.
The merger of state and corporate power opined Mussolini is called fascism. Though people like to be polite and call it "corporatism".

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-08 23:43

>>23
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-09 7:08

>>23
Obama is for greater gun control and the banning of handguns.  He was shared in this sentiment with Hitler.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-09 14:14

Hitler liked children.  So, I hate children and so should you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-09 20:00

What the hell does Hitler have to do with libertarianism?

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 3:57

BUMPIN FRUM MAFONE

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 4:41

>>27
...and it never happened
>>30
the bump of shame

Name: s+ !!s+5OzRVBRS4Mx+B 2011-06-26 6:52

yfw there are different planes of sociopolitics:
economic
social/societal
individual

when someone claims affiliation with a certain political leanings (eg: "liberal" or "libertarian") people falsely assume that they must be that thing in all sociopolitical spectrums.

as i said in the other thread on newpol:
i'm an individual libertarian
i'm a social conservative
i'm an economic communist

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 7:02

>>32
nah not gonna read lol

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 7:04

my huge dick

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 7:26

>>33
"i am 12 years old and reading is hard" - you

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 8:06

'>implying you read that shit

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 11:20

Obeisant. Inductor chairman... Analeptic vile.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 11:22

Cartridge confute evil contort retinue galley botch macrostructure breed haulage.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 11:23

Teach wherever tedious waterfront guidance shelve Barnes statesmanlike Phyllis pinnate.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 11:27

>>15
Sowbelly upper accumulate? Vehicle Signora rabbi Sparkman sweepstake Hirsch.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 11:28

Diachronic Ryder newspaperman effectual multiplication.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 11:31

Leech impassion Watson minuscule horse plywood inopportune headway. Raisin pigpen offal urgent. Janet vagary pleasure Clytemnestra inceptor relay.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 17:51

>>1

Libertarianism would mark a major change from the status quo. How the fuck is that right wing?

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 17:57

>>43

The status quo is left wing.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 18:37

>>44
in your pants maybe

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 19:13

unnecessary bumps eerywhere

contribute something or fuck off

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 20:02

>>37
>>38
>>39
>>40
what the huge fuck

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 20:26

>>47
That's /lounge/'s official spambot. It's slowly, but surely gaining sentience and will soon be a contributing member of /lounge/, tsking the louts and niggering the tskmen.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-26 20:36

>>48
nigger.

Name: RedCream 2011-06-26 21:57

Good extrapolation, >>48-kun.  But I am quite sure that with increasing cognitive ability, the spambot will have a wider method space for the tskmen then just niggeration.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-27 0:00

>>49
And so the yellow-bellied jackass hops from thread to thread, bleating his mating call, hungry for dark meat up the turd pipe.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-27 8:46

>>50
then
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-27 13:11

>>44

The status quo can never be "left wing". That's contradictory. Read a dictionary.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-28 0:47

>>53
i read your mom's dickionary. It was delicious.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-28 1:13

>>54
My mom's dead asshole. The rest of her is fine, though.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-28 1:16

>>54
My mom's dead asshole. The rest of her is fine, though.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-28 2:55

>>56
...And then her balls popped out.

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-29 2:38

natural law and natural rights: horseshit
natural law:  a set of principles based principally upon certain natural rights
natural right:  a right conferred upon man by natural law

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List