Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

So what's with ...

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-17 13:13

... the CEO of BP being 'interrogated' by, what is that? Congress?

Guilty or not, shouldn't (as he says) "We wait until the investigation is complete"

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-17 13:26

Duh, that's part of the investigation process.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-17 13:52

So what happens if it turns out that it's not BP's fault?

What are Congress going to say to the CEO? "Sorry we publicly humiliated you, turns out it wasn't your fault after all" ?

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-17 14:34

>>3

Doesnt matter they need a scapegoat

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-17 15:30

If you're gonna blame anyone, blame the Jackson 5 GET

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-17 16:48

>>5
I like you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-18 0:18

I still say it was Chinese

Name: Charles Barkley 2010-06-18 0:55

Congressional hearing was basically a bunch of grandstanding by politicians because the CEO of BP makes a convenient whipping boy.  They can look like they are "sticking up for the little guy".

In reality, the CEO of a company like BP knows nothing of engineering or drilling, and is not involved in the minute day-to-day operations.  So when he says "I don't know", he is probably telling the truth.

Also, people are upset because BP hasn't fired anyone yet.  Firing somebody before an investigation is finished is like throwing somebody in jail before the trial is over...

Not to mention that Congress has no sense of business or risk management principals...  Cutting costs on something doesn't necessarily mean that it is less safe, and adding more valves, ect. wouldn't necessarily have stopped this accident from happening.  Congress expects businesses to just do whatever is the most expensive.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-18 2:45

>>8
no it doesn't

Name: Charles Barkley 2010-06-18 12:53

>>9
no you don't

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-18 14:11

>>10
hams

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List