All this stuff about "Oh...How terrible, they looked like they were enjoying killing those children and baskets of kittens, those evil Americans" that's all lame superficial bollocks. Doesn't matter. It's chain of command. They have a job, it's to follow the orders of your superiors, they believe they're killing terrorists while they do it, who cares if they enjoy their job. They better do it fast too, before their comrades get killed. Soldiers acted perfectly reasonably. Idiot smelly unwashed hippies!
You have the enemy in your gunsights, you believe if you don't shoot soon they'll kill your mates. Are you eager to shoot? Fuck yeah.
If that's your concern you might as well switch back to Tiger Woods, idiot! Another smokescreen for the moronic superficial public. "Oh... They were shooting at the widdle children...."
What's important is what happened further up the chain of command. Were the non embedded journalists being targeted by the US military? Here's a piece of the puzzle. This is an example, there was a hotel were the non embedded journalists stayed that was shelled. It seems to be common practice by the Israelis to kill protesters and journalists.
That's the real issue, watch the media ignore that.
>>11
the dudes were just standing around, chilling. then got shot. later some guy is just walking down the sidewalk into the frame a few steps and they blow a missile at the building he's walking past. if you read the full dialogs, you'll also find some bad communication by the shooter to get permission from some remote commander who isn't there at all.