Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

MILKRIBS is an anus?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-08 18:40

Does MILKRIBS admit his role? Admit your role!

Name: Suigin !fKazami5bE 2010-02-08 18:45

I dont think anuses can post on the internet, sir

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-08 18:47

>>2
You must be knew hear!

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-08 18:48

Two loc'ed out niggas so we're craaaaazay!

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-08 18:49

So anyway, is the bricksock theory disproved?

Name: Suigin !fKazami5bE 2010-02-08 18:49

>>3
i dont know hear

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 2:38

>>1
wat/.?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 2:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 3:49

>>5
No that really did happen. The so-called milkribs4k who denies it is an impostor who cracked the original's tripcode. I was on IRC when milkribs came in. (it was around this time of day)

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 3:52

>>1
I think we all agree that >>1 is the only anus on lounge.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 4:04

>>9
I was on IRC when milkribs came in. (it was around this time of day)
Logs, please. Or get out.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 4:36

>>11
I don't keep logs but I think another anon posted the full logs in an earlier thread, do a search.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 6:56

>>9
I can confirm this. The real milkribs came on irc to tell us that he'd been attacked with a brick in a sock by someone from /fa/ who lived in his area and he was leaving 4chan forever. I did see a screenshot a while back on /lounge/ of a thread on /fa/ where the guy who did it posted pics but I can't find it right now.. This new milkribs is a group of four script kiddies called lulzpic who cracked his trip and take turns posting imitation milkribs posts.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 6:58

>>9
>>13
☯ Please don't make troll posts!☯

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 7:12

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 7:14

☯ Please don't make troll posts!☯

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 7:42

>>15
_██_
(゚、 ƪ) < No.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 8:23

>>14,15
Oh come the fuck on you hypocritical piece of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 8:26

>>18
_██_
(゚、 ƪ) < No.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 8:44

>>18
It's probably just Milkribs trying to be annoying

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:10

Jackson 5 GET

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 11:14

>>12
I don't keep logs but I think another anon posted the full logs in an earlier thread, do a search.
That's always the excuse. I have done a search and they're not there. Now since you did not provide logs, get out.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 11:15

>>13
You get out as well. Can't provide proof? Then get out.

Name: RedCream 2010-02-10 21:59


     █           █       ┌───────────────────────────┐
      █         █        │ ████  █   █ █   █ ████  █ │
       █████████    ─────┤ █   █ █   █ ██ ██ █   █ █ │
    ███ .█████ .███      │ ████  █   █ █ █ █ ████  █ │
   █████████████████     │ █   █ █   █ █   █ █       │
  █  █████████████  █    │ ████   ███  █   █ █     █ │
 █    █         █    █   └───────────────────────────┘
    ███         ███

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 2:17

>>24
Cream, don't spam!

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 3:39

If MILKRIBS is a fake, how do you explain the game he has poasted?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 3:54

>>26
What ! Listen to actual reason ? I'm too stupid to do that. Check the logs they were posted here no has ever seen them/linked to them stop being lazy and search for yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 3:57

>>26
They can't, because there's no such thing as the sockbrick incident. It was all a ruse. There's no such thing as IRC logs of it. Anyone telling you otherwise is most obviously a troll.

Name: RedCream 2010-02-11 4:53

Jeepers, this Milkribs impersonator storyline is getting intense! I shall call it The Anal Enigma.

THE ANAL ENIGMA -- Admit your role!

Name: RedCream 2010-02-11 4:57

      .-.                                    
     (/^\) 
     (\ /)                                    
     .-'-.     RedCream provides
    /(_I_)\    me with verything                               
    \\) (//    I seek in a real man      
     /   \                                    
     \ | /                                    
      \|/                                    
      /|\                                    
      \|/                                    
      /Y\

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 9:53

LOL WTF is this bullshit? I don't know if logs were posted but I too was on IRC when the original milkribs came in and confessed that he'd had his jaw broken by a sockbrick and was never coming back to 4chan. I don't see why logs are so important anyway. There was only 4 or 5 people on IRC at the time, at least three different people have posted here confirming that they witnessed the event. People who are trying to blur the facts are trolls, this new milkribs is not the original, the real milkribs was bricksocked.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 10:52

>>31
There was only 4 or 5 people on IRC at the time
Are you kidding me? #4chan averages between 220-260 nicks throughout the week. Even more if the site is down for prolonged periods of time. Granted, most of those are largely idle, but there's quite a bit more than just "4 or 5 people".

And since you were on IRC, could you tell us exactly what day this was on? And no, there were no logs posted, which is ridiculous, because nearly every time Milkribs came on to IRC to bitch about something, I always posted everything he said. The fact that nobody had done the simple task of copying and pasting leads me to seriously question if this sockbrick incident really happened at all.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:03

>>32
No I cannot remember the exact day. Yes there were only 4 0r 5 people on, it was a quiet time? Just because you like to post logs doesn't mean that others do. How many people have to confirm the sockbricking before you admit it was true?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:15

>>33
No I cannot remember the exact day.
How convenient. ( ´ _>`)
Yes there were only 4 0r 5 people on, it was a quiet time?
Define "4 or 5 people on", do you mean 4 or 5 actively speaking in the channel? Because there's a lot more than just "4 or 5" in total (including those who just idle and never or rarely speak).
Just because you like to post logs doesn't mean that others do.
Something so simple as a five minute copy and paste job, especially one of such an important event like Milkribs being assaulted with a sockbrick? Uh huh, yeah right. I don't buy that at all.
How many people have to confirm the sockbricking before you admit it was true?
Confirm what? There's nothing to confirm. What proof do you or others who continue to perpetuate this falsity have to present? None. There's no logs, no specific time or day even mentioned. Perhaps if at least that was provided, logs could be obtained from those who log the channel 24/7.

None of you have any proof to support your claim whatsoever. So how can any of you expect to be believed? You can't, and until you or anybody else show otherwise, this incident with Milkribs never happened.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:17

>>34
YHBT YHL HAND

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:18

>>35
YHBMT. Good day, sir.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:25

>>35
Yes, fellow /lounge/rs. The Milkribs sockbrick incident was nothing but just one big hoax. Perhaps started by none other than Milkribs himself. Now we can move on with our lives.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:30

>>36
YHJBDMT

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:31

>>38
HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRR

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:41

>>37
Hi, >>33 here, the idiot posting the letters is not me. As for your snore-fest of a diatribe:
Confirm what? There's nothing to confirm.
I meant confirm that milkribs did indeed come on IRC and say that he was assulted with a sockbrick.
None of you have any proof to support your claim whatsoever.
It has been confirmed by several people, apparently even your precious logs were posted earlier, but I can't find them.
Something so simple as a five minute copy and paste job
Just because it is simple doesn't make it worthwhile. (However I now wish I had taken logs just to shut up the trolls.)
this incident with Milkribs never happened.
LOL. Yeah it did, champ.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:48

>>40

O o
/¯/___________________\
| DIAHREHA BLAAAARH!
\_\¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯/

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:51

>>41
Listen here, jerkface. Take that back to /b/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 11:58

>>40
Forced meme is forced.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 12:07

>>40
I meant confirm that milkribs did indeed come on IRC and say that he was assulted with a sockbrick.
Confirm with what evidence. You can't confirm shit without supporting evidence.
It has been confirmed by several people, apparently even your precious logs were posted earlier, but I can't find them.
My logs were when he was bitching to a moderator to delete http://dis.4chan.org/read/lounge/1241382594/31 Oh and here they are! http://dis.4chan.org/read/lounge/1241391547/46-58
Just because it is simple doesn't make it worthwhile.
Not worthwhile to post logs about such an important event as Milkribs getting assaulted with a brick in a sock. Uh huh, sure.
(However I now wish I had taken logs just to shut up the trolls.)
I bet you do.
LOL. Yeah it did, champ.
You say it did, and yet you have no evidence to support your claim. Therefore, since there is no evidence presented, this event never happened. Until someone here comes forward with some credible evidence of some sort, then the validity of this particular event will remain in question.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 12:18

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 12:23

>>45
LULZ

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 12:32

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 12:33

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 12:34

>>44
Not worthwhile to post logs about such an important event as Milkribs getting assaulted with a brick in a sock.
Confirm with what evidence.
Okay, now I'm sure this guy is milkribs. Note the lack of question marks and the blatant trolling. Hi milky, how's the broken jaw?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 12:40

>>44
FFFFFUUUUU I HATE THE WORRLLLD FFFFUUUUU RAAAAAAAAAAGE FUCKCOCKCUNTSHIT

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 12:45

>>49
Whether you think I'm actually Milkribs or not is irrelevant. Thing is, you have no supporting evidence to back up your claim that Milkribs was hit with a brick in a sock. No IRC logs, no date and time given, nothing. You're perpetuating something that has gone unproven since late September/early November. Just admit that the incident in question never happened and allow /lounge/ to get on with its regular business.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 20:47

It's happened many times in my imagination.

Name: milkribs 2011-07-25 8:24

>>51
this

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-25 10:20

I don't know about all this "IRC" bullshit but milkribs most certainly did get hit with a brick in a sock after posting his face in the now defunct /fa/-fashion board multiple times. Another /fa/ member lived near him and identified him through his posts on /fa/. This is part of both /fa/ and world4ch history, despite what the "no IRC logs" troll would have you think.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-25 10:40

>>54
confirmed. i saw the thread on /fa/ where the guy posted pics of MILKRIBS4k with a bloody mouth from being hit with a bricksock or whatever he called it... wish i still had the pics but my hard drive crashed.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-25 11:30

>>55
I lol'd so hard at that /fashion/ post, poor milky

Name: !L33tUKZj5I 2011-07-25 12:12

Pics or it didn't happen.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List