Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

IDS

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-07 5:53

Would you like posting IDs back on world4ch? Like in 2007.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-10 17:56

>>27
I understand where you're coming from. We disagree, and that's fine. I'm just saying that being under such a system is not entirely detrimental to one's anonymity. Yes, it wouldn't be truly anonymous, however, I wouldn't equate having the old ID system turned back on with username attention whoring (i.e. tripcodes).

This board software was designed for anonymous posting.

Shiichan had this ID system implemented at one time.

If people want their posts to be attached to them they have the option, and I repeat, they have the option of using a tripcode.

Just as they have the option of using the ID system (using the sage function turns it off).

There is no forced anon or identification whether it be for the whole board or just a single thread. If you don't like this then please go away.

I never said I didn't like the current system. I'm just trying to understand why it's so adamantly opposed on here when the other "textboard" sites that have had it for years have no problem at all with this system. I just want to discuss the points of it, that's all.

btw are you a moron >>25? Because you sure seem like one.

There's no need to hurl insults like this. I'm just trying to have some discussion.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-10 18:09

>>41 sounds like a freedom hating pinko.... I don't like this one bit I tells ya..

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-10 18:17

>>41
You just don't get it, do you? Because of that, You're an anus!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-10 19:47

>>42
I had a good laugh, sir. Just hurling more baseless insults and more sensationalist overreaction to something that probably won't be reimplemented anyway. I just want to discuss about it. Fuck you for being such a rude jerkface about it.

>>43
Only anus in here is MILKRIBS.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-10 20:07

>>1
Well I guess you've got your answer. This argument is quite one-sided. The general consensus here is they're against the ID system from the old days returning. They didn't give any other reason besides that it wouldn't be true or total anonymity, and just threw baseless insults. I guess having an adult discussion of this on here was too much to ask for. Such is much of the Internet. I doubt we're going to have anymore pro-ID people on board in this thread.

Also, yes I am the same person as >>44 so in before someone says "same person".

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 4:59

Well the 420chan ID system on /b/ would be ideal. A least it'd keep the trolls at bay.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 5:06

>>46
Explain how it would please.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 5:15

>>47
It gives you a name that you cant change for 24 hours after that it is reset.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 5:29

>>48
Yes I understand that part but how exactly would it stop people from trolling?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 5:34

>>49
Well you'd now it's the same person- I guess I really didn't think this through...

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 5:58

Samefaging sounds like a good way to piss people off. moot should BRING BACK IDS

Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-10-11 8:50

>>51
What's "Samefaging"!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 9:30

>>52
That's when !Milkribs4k bends over to suck his own dick whilst fisting himself up the anus.

Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-10-11 9:40

>>53
Hold it there Kodak!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 14:25

>>54
That's when !Milkribs4k bends over to suck his own dick whilst fisting himself up the anus. Up the anus.

Name: Suigin !BvedRW2DFU 2009-10-11 22:06

>>55
gross stuff

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 22:08

WHERE THE FUCK IS REDCREAM

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 22:48

>>57
Well, he could be panning for gold up in the Yukon. ( ≖‿≖) Or maybe hanging out in Boston's Kenmore Square about to fight someone or whatever. Who knows.

Name: RedChineseCream 2009-10-11 23:03

>>57
I tell you, he busy!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 23:10

>>59
Can I get my happy ending yet?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 23:11

>>54-59
samefag

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 23:12

>>61
Would you just go back to /b/ already?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-11 23:51

>>61
>>62
Same fag

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-12 13:25

>>1
>>12
>>14
>>16
>>17
>>21
>>31
>>46
Scientologists

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-12 14:10

>>64
What!

Name: Anonymous 2011-06-30 0:47

RedCream is back and there's an awful lot of samefaggin' goin' on again.... Coincidence?

Name: RedCream 2011-06-30 1:19

>>66
Coincidence?
Yes.  It is a coincidence.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List