/lounge/ - Using 4chan as an academic source?

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 20:18

http://books.google.com/books?id=JQ2DsERAz9QC&pg=PA45&dq=4chan.org#v=onepage&q=4chan&f=false

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 20:22

http://books.google.com/books?id=IUnjwtphGDIC&pg=PA111&dq=world4ch&lr=#v=onepage&q=world4ch&f=false

And world4ch?

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 21:05

Fail. gtfo

Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-08-09 21:16

wwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-08-09 21:21

>>2
This is the thread that is being quoted! http://dis.4chan.org/read/anime/1127335674

Name: Anusymous 2009-08-09 21:23

>>5
You're an anus!

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 21:47

>>5
http://books.google.com/books?id=IUnjwtphGDIC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_navlinks_s#v=snippet&q=anonymous&f=false

Negroes don't exist in Japan

(Anonymous blogger, 2006)

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 21:55

http://books.google.com/books?q=%22you%27re+an+anus%22

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 22:57

blogger? WTF

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 1:55

>>5
Specially this post is cited http://dis.4chan.org/read/anime/1127335674/140 Why the hell did they chose this almost incoherent, silly, lazy comment that probably some kid who was underage at the time authored I'm sure.

There's plenty of other comments that produce more intelligently and coherently oriented discussion on Black or African descended characters in Japanese Anime or lack thereof.

Or perhaps they chose that post to deliberately discredit 4chan or world4ch, that it couldn't even if occasionally be a vessel for intelligent discussion.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 2:04

>>10
Actually they quoted http://dis.4chan.org/read/anime/1127335674/244, see >>7
Not sure why it's a different number now. But it's still kind of a random thing to quote in a book. There's not even anything meaningful in the post, it's just a half-joke

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 3:51

>>8
3 results :-]

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 4:51

my mom once sliced her thumb open with a cat of cat food

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 8:46

non-retarted thread bump

Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-08-10 9:13

>>14
NO THANK YOU

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 9:16

>>15
Fuck off dickface, you're worse than that guy bumping
lol/lounge/.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 9:20

>>16
It's the same guy, haven't you noticed that whenever milkyfail4k makes his daily round of posts, lol lounge is always the top thread?

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 11:46

Just think, four years from now, THIS post may be cited.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 12:48

Huh. If someone needs a source on Mr. Anus being an anus, there's a lot to cite.

Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-08-10 12:58

>>17
What are you trying to say motherfucker!

Name: Anusymous 2009-08-10 12:58

>>20
You're an anus!

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 13:03

>>20
Jeepers, the internet sure does bring out the worst in people! I'll add this quote to the book I'm writing on trolling!

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 13:12

>>20
* What are you trying to say, motherfucker‽

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 13:31

>>23
I'm trying to say that your astral powers are bullshit! I guess you didn't try hard enough, because nothing has happened to me!
Robert C.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 16:04

>>21
A big anus that can talk and feel?

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 17:47

use this as an academic source
*grabs dick*

Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-08-10 18:06

>>26
Ya, if you are a queer!

Name: Anusymous 2009-08-10 18:10

>>27
You're an anus!

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 18:15

>>27
Philistine.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-23 12:52

moot. 4chan.org... someone can't cite for shit. The editors ought to be fired, as in, spit roasted over an open flame.

They're also violating a shit load of human ethics standards.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-23 13:04

>>30
They're also violating a shit load of human ethics standards.
How exactly?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-23 13:15

>>31

They're quoting 4chan as if it is a text issued by a singular author.

Instead, while 4chan has textual characteristics, it is a society.

They're displaying the same kind of soc/anthr ram-raiding which rich whites do to "primitive" cultures and workers cultures.

4chan are bad subjects, naughty boys, and they're so naughty they're sending their sociologists after us. Thankfully, their sociologists are incompetent buffoons. But imagine if they sent Vampire Foucault after us? Look how badly Foucault fucked poofs up.

Name: VIPPER 2011-01-23 17:45

Screw 4chan!

Using 4chan as an academic source?

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 20:18

2 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 20:22

3 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 21:05

4 Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-08-09 21:16

5 Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-08-09 21:21

6 Name: Anusymous 2009-08-09 21:23

7 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 21:47

8 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 21:55

9 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-09 22:57

10 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 1:55

11 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 2:04

12 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 3:51

13 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 4:51

14 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 8:46

15 Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-08-10 9:13

16 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 9:16

17 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 9:20

18 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 11:46

19 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 12:48

20 Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-08-10 12:58

21 Name: Anusymous 2009-08-10 12:58

22 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 13:03

23 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 13:12

24 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 13:31

25 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 16:04

26 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 17:47

27 Name: !MILKRIBS4k 2009-08-10 18:06

28 Name: Anusymous 2009-08-10 18:10

29 Name: Anonymous 2009-08-10 18:15

30 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-23 12:52

31 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-23 13:04

32 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-23 13:15

33 Name: VIPPER 2011-01-23 17:45