Using 4chan as an academic source?

http://books.google.com/books?id=JQ2DsERAz9QC&pg=PA45&dq=4chan.org#v=onepage&q=4chan&f=false

>>5
Specially this post is cited http://dis.4chan.org/read/anime/1127335674/140 Why the hell did they chose this almost incoherent, silly, lazy comment that probably some kid who was underage at the time authored I'm sure.

There's plenty of other comments that produce more intelligently and coherently oriented discussion on Black or African descended characters in Japanese Anime or lack thereof.

Or perhaps they chose that post to deliberately discredit 4chan or world4ch, that it couldn't even if occasionally be a vessel for intelligent discussion.