>>228
Normally, I'd agree with you (which is why normally, I wouldn't make a post like
>>227), but these are not normal times and when I was referring to "world4ch", I was referring to all the boards under its name, not just /lounge/. If you take a quick look at
/prog/, you'll see that it's no longer the place it used to be (I'm surprised that
/prog/ didn't die sooner), same with pretty much any other board. Looking at old /lounge/ threads from 2007, they certainly weren't great, but world4ch as a whole had better threads and posts than it does now.
Or, I could be wrong and it's all a cyclical thing. Maybe the fact that it's text-only adds as a check and balance to keeping it from degenerating into complete shit. Judging by how things stand now (with world4ch as a whole and not just /lounge/), I'm going to have to consider the former rather than the latter as the more possible outcome.