War ideas

OK, so the US is a source of thousands of aborted fetuses every month.  Why don't we collect those fetuses and just dump them out of planes over enemy territory?  It would be awesome to see the enemies ponder what the fuck are all the oddly small skulls doing all over the place.

Don't tell me that it is a fucked up idea.  We already blow people apart into chunks and make weird guns that microwave your eyes and shit.  It's not any more fucked up, merly creative.  We need creative warfare.  Everyone is used to the kill and rape stuff and hardly notice anymore.

>>1
oh d00d, you've GOT TO an hero right now d00d.

d00d

>>2
you've GOT TO an hero right now d00d.

an hero

Back to /b/, please.

>>4
SPAM

DRINK COCA COLA FOR THAT REFRESHING BROWNESS

the best way to kill people always involves some sort of irony...

I like your thinking >>1
lets hear more suggestions in this thread on how to creatively fight a war. OK go!

kidnap people, make them explosive (using chemicals) then launch them out of artillery against them

>>1
It would cause some confusion ,i'll give you that, but I dont think it would do much destruction.

>>1
No the fetuses are needed for stem cell research.

I dream of cocks drifting across the blue sky.

>>9
That's not the point.  We can't get much better at actual destruction anyhow.

>>10
We don't need 100000 fetuses, we have an embarrassing wealth of fetuses that go to waste as it is.

How about dumping urine on Japan?

>>13
That's just gross!

>>14
You're an anus!

Most aborted foetus' are just puddles of tissue after the procedure, and even the products of "partial birth abortions" are more like jellied humans than people.  They would bust like water balloons if dropped from a plane, and leave no "oddly small skulls".  Here's an Idea:  Instead of the wars where the rich people send the poor people to fight each other, lets make war on those who deserve it.

>>16
And who might that be? The fat cats on walstreet?

>>17
They're definitely on the list.

>>16
ok how about amputated limbs then

We should kill poor people who don't work aswell.

>>19
Now that gives me an idea.  Instead of creating lethal weapons, we should try to create weapons designed to amputate limbs.  It's already known that it's better to wound enemy soldiers in war, because then it takes manpower to move them to safety.  If the objective was to amputate limbs then morale would plummet as people at home became surrounded by cripples, medical research into dealing with the most serious injuries, and prosthetics would advance exponentially, and we could even sell the "Philosophy of Non Lethal Warfare" as being altruistic.

>>21
Being surrounded by cripples would only increase my morale.

You have to realize most of the wars today are about winning the peoples hearts so that they wont harbour the enemy in their civilian homes. We have all these rules today that sez u can't just kill everyone untill the insurgents come out.
The western powers already can kill people just fine(200 US marines could take out entire armies of africans and shit with some air support) in CONVENTIONAL warfare but the problem is all these goddamn insurgents and the civillian population who shelter them.
Muslims for example are very conservative people who would completly lose any allegiance to the US if we started hurling dead babies at them.

>>23
way to miss the point

>>22
You're an amputee fetishist?

-Use special ops to add laxatives to enemy food supplies.
-Kidnap the enemy leader, force him to have sex with a young boy and videotape it. Then hack the enemy tv channels to show this video non-stop.
-Gather all your insane people, retards, serial rapists, and serial/spree killers and paradrop them over the enemy country.

>>26
1. We've done that.
2. Unethical because of the boy, but if a midget was willing...
3. I like it.