Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

/r9k/ - ROBOT9000

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-21 23:23

Looks like MOOT wants original content, so he made this board. Allow me to poast the instructional sticky and the link:

http://img.4chan.org/r9k/imgboard.html

/r9k/ is a board with no reposts.
Rules/observations/etc:
1. If you attempt to post something unoriginal, it is not posted.
2. In this case you are muted temporarily.
3. The time with which you are muted for increases with each transgression.
4. Each mute time is 2^n (thanks, mathsfags) in seconds where n is the number of times you have transgressed. So, your mute time is the amount of fuck ups you have made to the power of two, in seconds.
5. Quotes, eg >>1, are not viewed by R9K. So "lolwut" and ">>2 lolwut" are the same post, in the eyes on R9K.
6. Gibberish at the end of a post to force originality is punished with the full force of the banhammer. Even testing R9K's parameters seems to draw the ire of the mods.
6(2). Images are included. Slight changes in exif data, etc, however, seem to circumvent this rule, but like with text if you break the filter the REAL LIVE MODS will banhammer you.
8. Your mute count never resets or goes backwards.
9. You cannot post a picture without text.
10. You cannot impersonate moot.
11. Unicode is blocked. Sorry, too many exploits (Cyrillic letters, etc)
12. The too low in content filter was broken for a while, resulting in a lot of crappy mutes. Sorry.
13. Post sane, real content, well thought out replies, and mutes are unlikely.

Here is the thread where we can waste all the words: http://img.4chan.org/r9k/res/74868.html#76151

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-27 9:30

I don't know exactly how the robot judges originality, but lets just say for simplicity's sake that the same exact post can't be made twice. Of course this is going to be a disaster in the very long run, but as long as the poster has something worthwhile and relevant to say, there wont be too much of a problem in the short run. And it can always be secretly reset.

If you're going to make a detailed post – take this one for example – then what are the odds that someone has already or will in the future make this exact same post? Of course the situation depends heavily on the exact workings of the robot. For all I know only part of the post has to be literally the same for it to judge it a repost. Obviously only a fool would make such a thing. And moot happens to be one. Oh dear...

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List