Agree or disagree? I think that it would be better if more people could be converted into /b/tards. Get off your lazy ass and stop just telling people to LURK MOAR and actually make it easier for people to become a /b/tard because there probably were many potential /b/tards that were turned away either because
1. They do not know of the nature of anon OR
2. They do not know how to do so.
Why is LURK MOAR unhelpful? because it does not tell them where to lurk. It might as well be telling them to LURK MOAR on some other website. The full message ought to be LURK MOAR IN /b/.
Yes, it may be true that some people are not capable of being a /b/tard. However, most out there are fully capable of doing so, and with some effort, we can help turn some into /b/tards who otherwise would not have done so if we never spent any effort in doing so.
/b/ is clogged up as it is with newfags, camwhores, spammers and Gaiafags. We don't need anymore people to go to /b/, or 4chan for that matter. It is fucking chaos in there, I don't even feel like going anymore.. it's sad. It used to be better.
If anything, Moot should just take out /b/ for a while. Maybe the newfags will forget about it and move on.. because /b/ is in a chaotic state right now. Horrible.
>>3
You're just jealous that I arrived at the clever "4chANUS" name, and YOU did NOT. I mean, look at your name, Anonymous -- it's literally GREEN with envy ... I mean, RLY, talk about:
! EXTREME FAGGOTRY !
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-10 15:54
>>9
It's green because I'm not using email, you homo. I thought you would know better, RedCream.
I didn't realize the current population of /b/ (children) think 'lurk more' means going to other places to find out information.
It's 'lurk more' on the place you were told to lurk more.
OP here. I meant it would be better for society, not for 4chan. Yes, we have to sacrifice a little at 4chan, but I think it shall be worth it to solve all the problem of political faggots like Huckabee, Romney, McCain, Tom Delay, Bill Frist, James Dobson, Pat Robertson, almost all republicans, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Edwards. I think that at the cost of some newfaggotry, faggotry in general, crowdedness, among other problems, that it would be worth it if congress was made up of a majority of senators and representatives who were friendly to 4chan.
What the fuck is up with everybody wanting their entire life to revolve around 4chan? This isn't a site that was meant for people to relate to outside of the internet. It's a site you enjoy on the internet without having to worry about people knowing you like it.
Now you stupid faggots are trying to turn it into a lifestyle. Seriously, fuck off and make your own board if you want a community like that.
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-11 20:58
>>18
It shouldn't be a lifestyle, but it should be a political force. You don't think that the 70% of people in the U.S. who oppose pornography are not harmful? 2ch in Japan has the audience of almost 2/3 of the entire population there, and has wide political influence. If 4chan reached that status in the U.S., then all the people claiming that pornography is a bad thing would be nonexistent.
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-11 21:11
Japan censors cocks in their porn, and their age of consent is like 13. 2ch has absolutely nothing to do with their laws, and they are not a political force. You are retarded for even beginning to think that.
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-11 21:35
>>20 You're retarded for not thinking it. Yes, it is not political, but it does affect popular opinion. If 4chan were as popular as 2ch is in Japan, then nobody would oppose pornography anymore.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-15 18:49
Sorry for the bump, but does anybody seriously believe that society would be better if it looked more like /b/?