fail? in MY niggers?

"Sparks inevitably flew. Phil Rushton, with an anti-apartheid activist as his co-author, shocked the g-doubters with results from IQ testing in one of Africa’s two best universities, Witwatersrand. He has found that the black African students had a mean IQ of only 84. Assuming top-flight university students have IQs at least one standard deviation above the mean, this yields an estimate of an average IQ of only 70 for Africans as a group."

Have they gotten rid of the cultural and other biases in IQ tests yet?

>>2
their existance was a myth fagcream.

>>3
Post a link or that's not true.

>>4
lol. give examples of bias in iq tests please failcream.

>>5
Documentation on such has long existed.  That's the common knowledge and a simple googling can produce them.  GOOGLE MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU SPEAK IT?

What's the outrageous claim is that those are somehow mythical.  Hence, post the link or it didn't happen.

>>6
http://wonderfulscenario.com/iq/iq-bias/links.htm
has a list of links to various studies proving that iq tests are not bias.

>>6
what now failcream? get owned did you?

>>7
GTFO WIT UR BROWSER HIJACK!

GORGE URSEF DAILY WIT ASSRING CEREAL!

>>8
You just pwned yourself for a failure to understand perfectly well written English.  Read >>6 over and over until you finally understand.  Wanker.

>>9
lawl. failcream got pwn'd as usual. Now will you admit niggers are just plain dumb?

>>10

Read http://wonderfulscenario.com/iq/iq-bias/links.htm over and over until you finally understand.  failure.

>>11
Firstly, Mr. Can't-Understand-Previous-Postings, the OP talked about Blacks attending university, NOT niggers.

So, post proof of this dumbness or GTFO.  Link, or it didn't happen.

The actual nigger dumbness is best expressed by YOU, in your insistence that a cultural desire is somehow expressed in physical truth.

>>12
FAIL.  Link is a browser hijacker and you need to eat Black cocks until your stomach tears open from the overfilling cockmeat.

post proof of this dumbness or GTFO.  Link, or it didn't happen.

http://wonderfulscenario.com/iq/iq-bias/links.htm

The actual nigger dumbness is best expressed by YOU, in your insistence that a cultural desire is somehow expressed in physical truth.

lol. you're a pseudo-intellectual.

>>15
FAIL.  Link is a browser hijacker and you are still a failsome failer of the highest failorder.  POST A LINK OR IT'S NOT TRUE, GAYFAILER!

RedCrank, if the tests are made to be biased by the Whites who write them, why do Asians and Jews score higher than Whites? The general consensus amongst sociologists is that 50-80% of the IQ differences across groups is accountable for by hereditary factors--not environment or other biases. Also, with regards to environmental factors, the rationale is that poor environment is generally a result of low IQ, not the cause.

It seems to me perfectly rational that different races would vary in cognitive ability, just as they do in appearance and countless other features. The people who make far more absurd claims are the ones who claim blacks are equal in all senses of the word, including mental ability. Where the hell is the proof of this baseless assumption?

>>17
Once again we see Hyperliberal gayfailing in action.  Where did I claim Blacks were equal?  I merely stated I wanted to know when these IQ tests were determined to be free of cultural biases.  THAT'S IT.  The rest is a set of assumptions built into you by Hyperliberal indoctrination.

And, at any rate, you just admitted it anyway:

"The general consensus amongst sociologists is that 50-80% of the IQ differences across groups is accountable for by hereditary factors--not environment or other biases."

That means 30-50% is NOT hereditary.  This is the West admitting its IQ tests have a STRONG cultural selector built into them.  At the alleged minimum 30% environmental component, the error margin is HUGE for hereditary conclusions, hence you can hardly say that any result you get matters.

Does this mean Blacks in SA are of low intelligence?  By using Western-constructed IQ tests, the result is:  No one knows.

>>18
Like I said before, poor environment is a consequence of low IQ; it's not a truly independant factor. IQ effects environment too.

Really all that's up for debate is if black's IQ is lower by 1 or 1.1 standard deviations. The genetic difference is already proven--and proven to be very large.

>>18
Somehow Asians score more than whites on same Western-constructed IQ tests with "STRONG cultural selector built into them".
Does it mean that all tests are made by weeaboos or secret cryptochinks?

>>20
way to bump a five year old

>>22
This is an amusing thread where I last measured RedCream couple years back.

I missed this one somehow.  In '07 I was mostly watching RedCream make a fool of himself in /tech/ and /comp/.

Thanks for the age, /lounge/rs.