>>15
>then in the books and stuff you read
Last book I read was East of Eden by Steinbeck.
>So how does it relate to other worlds or existences?
You have to consider what the sub/un/2nd consciousness is, especially what it does too because it never stops doing it, even if you can't see what its doing which is about a majority of the time and even then what you see is only what you experience and you are limited to only one experience, your subconscious on the otherhand probably has omnipotence there which means it can observe analyze and maybe even make decisions in a so far undetermineable amount of situations be they similar related or otherwise involving one's self. I wonder, what would be the purpose for it having the ability to do this let alone the fact that it probably does it always? Doesn't it seem like there's a little more to the issue than the fact that being able to even see anything about it is a "trick"?
>I was so easily mislead.
Yeah for a moment you existed in a derivative of existance, if only in your mind and if only for just a second but it seemed like a certainty didn't it? A different but similar you probably did remember his watch that night, and maybe the othe rguy didn't have it, what if for that moment you were in that situation but then the past changed and you didn't have the watch? Which technically the past changed twice for you, but it still happened, sure it was just a "misinterpretation" or "coincidence" in this reality, but wouldn't that mean you were interpreting a different reality in that moment? Who is to really say that it doesn't exist just because it isn't the one you are in?