how do you figure? i don't see too many jews doing much with science.
however, no jews = more money for everyone else, not as many dirtbag lawyers.
on the other hand, we'll probably have slightly worse movies. i say throw em in the oven anyway.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-11 4:51
Why is it that when you think of Nazi you think of jew?
He Alrso tried to keil everybody who waz not da straight, but i tink female iz hot so iz bad 50%
and ya, cuz he stronger. he so powerful he make germany from poo poo to golden bar lolz iz pro alchemist with da philosophers stone u noe?
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-11 6:39
>>7
Capitalism isn't a zero-sum game. Just because someone has more doesn't mean you have less because of it.
Btw you seem to know much about science. For instance, many of the greatest physicists of the 20th century were jews: Einstein, Bohr, Bloch, Feynman, Landau, Pauli, Gell-Mann, ...
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-11 7:35
If I was not so lazy I would show you that there are a shit load more scientists that are none kikes.
I hear the Final Solution was merely an attempt to deport all Jews to Madagascar, but logistics were too much of a problem. And all Jews were rationed three times a day with more calories than most Germans got due to food shortage. And all Jews were given access to recreational facilities and medical treatment. And gas chambers were never used, while cremation was never used on live people but on cadavers. And no official documents or orders have mentioned the Holocaust aside from a forgery that is accepted as proof. And all court testimonials by German officers were due to manipulation and threats by Jewish interrogators. And that 6 million deaths was a gross exaggeration used decades earlier, while millions have been claimed to have been killed by Romans and others throughout history. Even the quoted numbers of Israelites gathering in the temple or moving during the Exodus would be too much logistically. So all Jews naturally exaggerate numbers to generate sympathy.
But I see none of this on Wikipedia, a site that claims to present facts. The only conclusion is that Wikipedia is wrong.
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy