Name: Anonymous 2006-07-10 22:19
Now I'm not gonna lie, I admit there are kids out there who are underage that can consent and deal with having sex with an adult or someone much older than them without being emotionally damaged. However, these kids are in the EXTREME FUCKING MINORITY. These kids are fucking rare. I'm bringing this up because there was this huge fucking thread in /b/ where someone cried at pedophiles, and then pedofags came in and tried to justify their ways.
YOU CAN'T FUCKING JUSTIFY WANTING TO BONE A LITTLE KID. Most kids DON'T want a cock in their ass and cunt, and don't give me shit about morals being relative. If morals are relative then there's no difference between genocide and giving someone a handshake. It goes like this:
A person who says morals are relative is saying that morals vary from person to person and culture to culture, that it's not diferent than opinion. By this logic, everybody has thier own moral code but it only applies to them, because morality isn't universal. However, what does a moral relativist do if someone says morality is universal and applies to all people? If the moral relativist says that this is wrong, they're conforming to a standard in which morality can be judged, but this is exactly what moral relativism is against. Therefore, moral relativism contradicts itself. wow that was gay too long etc.
And then there were about 4 or 5 fucking people who tried to justify by quoting nietsczhe and his ubermensch shit. OH YEAH GUYS THE MOST DISGUSTING OVERWEIGHT ANIME FAGGOT WEEABOO WHO SPENDS HOURS MASTURBATING TO LOLICON ON NOT4CHAN TRANSCENDS EVERYONE ELSE LOL
so yeah fuck those niggers
YOU CAN'T FUCKING JUSTIFY WANTING TO BONE A LITTLE KID. Most kids DON'T want a cock in their ass and cunt, and don't give me shit about morals being relative. If morals are relative then there's no difference between genocide and giving someone a handshake. It goes like this:
A person who says morals are relative is saying that morals vary from person to person and culture to culture, that it's not diferent than opinion. By this logic, everybody has thier own moral code but it only applies to them, because morality isn't universal. However, what does a moral relativist do if someone says morality is universal and applies to all people? If the moral relativist says that this is wrong, they're conforming to a standard in which morality can be judged, but this is exactly what moral relativism is against. Therefore, moral relativism contradicts itself. wow that was gay too long etc.
And then there were about 4 or 5 fucking people who tried to justify by quoting nietsczhe and his ubermensch shit. OH YEAH GUYS THE MOST DISGUSTING OVERWEIGHT ANIME FAGGOT WEEABOO WHO SPENDS HOURS MASTURBATING TO LOLICON ON NOT4CHAN TRANSCENDS EVERYONE ELSE LOL
so yeah fuck those niggers