Exposing the Atheist

The best way to understand the nature of atheism is to understand its author. Satan is its author.

It's important to remain conscious of the fact that Satan had his origin in heaven, and is thoroughly familiar with the fact of the existence of God, heaven, the angels, hell and etc. Thus despite what you have been previously, deceptively taught and despite the deceptive dictionary's meaning of atheism, atheism is properly defined as a denial of the existence of God in the midst of full knowledge that the true God does indeed exist. Atheism knows God exists; it is quite familiar with that fact, but it says "under no circumstance or situation will I admit to God's existence."

Atheism clearly perceives the fingerprints of God on all of creation, but refuses to admit He is the Creator. Atheism perceives the divine authorship of the TEN COMMANDMENTS, but refuses to admit that God is their Author. Atheism perceives the decorousness and perfection of the TEN COMMANDMENTS, but refuses to admit they are superior to all other laws. Atheism clearly perceives the divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ, but refuses to admit His divinity. If an atheist could see the wounds in the body of Christ and actually feel them with his hands, he would deny that the wounds are there. Atheism is deliberate effort to never admit the existence of God.

>>56

I havent heard shit about someone "calculating" the age of the universe. Now the age of earth, we can calculate to a reasonable degree of accuracy using our understanding of "half-life". Its beats the hell out of "earth is 6000 years old because bible says so"

There is a force that holds atoms together? That is an example of a scientific HYPOTHESIS. There is a HUGE difference between:

1. a force may exist; it appears as though a force is holding the atoms together. We dont have concrete proof yet, but we are going to conduct tests to find out if we are right.
2. a force does exist; we know this because SOMTHING has to be holding atoms together. Our proof is our faith.

An example of a scientific hypothesis is #1. You admit that you dont actually know, but you state your reasoning for a prediction that you are going to TEST.

*has idea*

1. there may be a god; we dont know exactly how the universe started, so the existance of a diety is a POSSIBILITY. However, we DO NOT HAVE ANY proof at this time. We are going to cunduct tests/studies to find the truth.
2. there IS a god. we KNOW this because the universe had to come from somewhere(logic). We dont have any proof at this time, but its the only explanation we can come up with, so why not teach it to our kids as fact? When the appocolypse rolls around we will all be proven right anyway.

^ if you must toy with the idea that god exists, subscribe to the first (its HYPOTHETICAL/TESTABLE) outlook.