Exposing the Atheist

The best way to understand the nature of atheism is to understand its author. Satan is its author.

It's important to remain conscious of the fact that Satan had his origin in heaven, and is thoroughly familiar with the fact of the existence of God, heaven, the angels, hell and etc. Thus despite what you have been previously, deceptively taught and despite the deceptive dictionary's meaning of atheism, atheism is properly defined as a denial of the existence of God in the midst of full knowledge that the true God does indeed exist. Atheism knows God exists; it is quite familiar with that fact, but it says "under no circumstance or situation will I admit to God's existence."

Atheism clearly perceives the fingerprints of God on all of creation, but refuses to admit He is the Creator. Atheism perceives the divine authorship of the TEN COMMANDMENTS, but refuses to admit that God is their Author. Atheism perceives the decorousness and perfection of the TEN COMMANDMENTS, but refuses to admit they are superior to all other laws. Atheism clearly perceives the divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ, but refuses to admit His divinity. If an atheist could see the wounds in the body of Christ and actually feel them with his hands, he would deny that the wounds are there. Atheism is deliberate effort to never admit the existence of God.

>>44
and irrational egoist have a way of explaining "statistical possibilities" as special powers. I fully acknowledge that scientific explanation is only as good as the observations it based on. My main point was religions inflexibility. most ideologies based off of holy texts or teachings come with a presupposition of absolute truth. after all, if its really the word of god or one of his chosen underlings it must be perfect. "Every word and every title" or something to that effect. science however, is built off sets of hypothetical premises that, when taken as a whole, can re-affirm each other. It's technically possible we have it all wrong, a la the Matrix taken to the nth power, however the current record of "things were science works" vs "things were science kinda works" runs a hell of a lot better than any of the good books. As (I assume based on your response) a fellow pragmatist, surely you would admit science's various attempts at finding truth have served humanity more than the blanket "god did it, mysterious ways, etc." "explanation".

tl;dr: If you're so special, go dream me a winning lotto ticket.