As far as I know "spelt" is an older form of the
p.p. of spell that is still common in British English.
Is your dictionary really so poor that it omits
this information?
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-02 21:36
My level 255 garidos could pwn you hard.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-02 21:39 (sage)
Pokemon is for kids.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-02 22:04
Pfft, they're the coolest thing to ever be made. Just look at Snorlax.....C'mon! Look at 'em!
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-03 2:51
Snorlax? sounds like a super laxitive.....oh what he was a pokemon
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-03 17:15
>>6
Lies! They only go up to lv. 99 >>7 Incorrect, you mean 4Kids.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-03 18:24
>>7 >>10
NOT ANYMORE POKEMON IS NOW POKEMONUSA PROPERTY AND IS MORE WAPANESE THAN EVER
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-04 4:22
veronica taylor is hawwwttttttt as lenneth is kawaii desu
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-04 18:24
more of lenneth
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-05 0:37
TokyoTosho the #pocketmonsters torrent of the Mastermind of the Mirage Pokemon.
Fighting was alright. Super Melee Rockman Mewtwo brought in the pain.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-05 1:06
my mew pwns ur doods kekekekekekeke ^_^
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-05 1:13 (sage)
Pokemon is for kids & 4chan is 18+ only.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-05 2:33
>>16
pokemon is not property of 4kids anymore
kekekekekekeke ^_^
Actually, before you get ready to lynch anyone, maybe you should read this right to the end, you might be less inclined to lynch them by then, or perhaps you'll still want to lynch them, as well as lynch someone else. The new Pokemon dub is pretty weak, or at least that’s what everyone tells me. I haven’t seen it yet, though, and I probably never will. From what I hear, it appears that Pokemon USA and their dubbing studio, TAJ, just didn’t put a lot of effort into the show. Obviously no one is expecting Disney-esque level of dubbing here. In fact I’m sure fans would be delightfully surprised if the dub had been up to the usual anime standards of studios like NYAV Post, Phoenix Post Sound, or New Generation Pictures. All fans really expected was something that lived up to the original dub (which isn’t setting a very high bar to strive for). Yet somehow, Pokemon USA, a company that only really has one title to worry about, managed to bungle it.
You might be thinking, “Who cares? It’s just Pokemon.” But then, you’re probably not a Pokemon fan. Think of it this way: how do you feel when you complain about the dubbing of your latest, favorite anime, and someone responds, “So? It’s only a cartoon.”
Those of you who are Pokemon fans know that you expect a certain amount of quality from Pokemon. You’re not irrational; you know that Pokemon isn’t Ghibli, so your expectations are appropriately lower than those of a Ghibli fan. But still, you have certain expectations, and those expectations haven’t been met.
To paraphrase a few dozen Pokemon fans, “The general consensus is that all the voices, except maybe Misty, sound horrible and way too old. May was waaaaay too deep and sounds like a prostitute, Ash was just wrong and sounds too much like Luffy from One Piece, Brock sounds more like an old idiot about to jump off a cliff, and Max sounds 5 years older.” Of course, a lot of fans just complained that they sounded “different,” which isn’t too bad, but remember, this is a show for children, and sound-alikes would have been a good idea.
Now, as you probably already know, Pokemon USA used new voice actors for this project. So the blame is clearly on Pokemon USA for this mess, right?
Well, like any responsible news source, we asked, or tried to ask Pokemon USA about this. Problem is, they won’t comment. They won’t tell us why the old voice actors aren’t involved in the show. We strive to give both sides of any dispute, but with no comments from Pokemon USA, they’re making it very hard to present their side of the story.
Maybe they just don’t care, but we still want to give them the benefit of the doubt. Without their side of the story, all we have is the actors’ claims that Pokemon USA “decided” not to employ them. The actors themselves never really offered any information as to why Pokemon USA “decided” not to employ them.
Could it be that shiny, new non-compete clause that 4Kids may have put in their contracts? The one that wouldn’t let them work on any 4Kids projects that get transferred to other companies? Nah, couldn’t be. 4Kids would never do something as underhanded as intentionally sabotaging Pokemon USA’s version of Pokemon. What would 4Kids have to gain from such an action? That is, other than the possibility of Pokemon USA conceding defeat and giving the property back to 4Kids, or Pokemon just being reduced to a less competitive state, giving 4Kids’ new properties more opportunity in the marketplace.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-06 16:37
>>28
Animation on Pokemon was always pretty low quality. I watched it from the beginning, years and years ago. I stopped watching it after the first or second season, but animation was never important, I liked the story and characters. It was kid's stuff, but still entertaining. So when you change voice actors that's about the best way to effectively ruin a show. Dragon Ball Z has suffered that a few times.
They're probably counting on the fact that most Pokemon fans are 9 year olds so they don't care about anything as long as they see Pikachu.
>>33
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
dubs won this time
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy