Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

are the lives of parents worth more

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-01 1:45

are the lives of parents/carers worth more than childless folks? this popped into my head the other day. is it more moral to let a parent and a childless person die, if you had to choose one?
or, if you were stranded on a desert island with a bunch of other people, and there was one pie that survived as food, should a person with children get the pie?

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-01 1:46

oops. bad grammar on my part: should read "let a parent OR" (not and)

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-01 2:06

It depends if they are good parents.  Most people who are childless now don't want to bring children into a world of shit, where as alot of people pumping out their 4th kid now are 23 year old cum dumpsters.  90% of parents today have no business raising kids.  So it really doesn't matter.  Now a days kids may be better off fending for themselves rather than having some dumbass not dicipline them and spoil the shit out of them.
So kill em both and let god sort em out.
As for the pie, it depends, if the parent is a fat piece of shit who has ugly kids, you starve them and make them eat bugs.  The pie is for people with high metabolisms that can run off the pie for a day.  Not eat it in 5 minutes and want a helping of macaroni and cheese.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-01 3:35

>>3
I agree partially, with what you're saying.
Some problems are from spoiled kids growing up, but
my brother was beat with extention cords,(plug side, so he could bleed) a table leg, and other things, and turned out to be a drug dealer/identity theif, to get the money QUICKLY to leave on his own...
moral of this story, there's no moderation (look that word up wussies-n-"badasses") with parents today.
you're either letting them get away with murder, or beating them to within an inch of their lives, over spilled milk.
and even worse you wonder Where the world"s problems come from?

Name: Ninevrise0AV 2006-05-01 21:14

>>3
YES. My GOD yes.
And the worst are these people who don't have a partner, and go to sperm banks, or can't have children of their own easily, and so spend hundreds of thousands of dollars, and undergo fucking SURGERY to get their precious babies. Fuck the fact that there are thousands of starving kids in the world waiting to be adopted for a tenth of what your paying to have that doctor inject you with random jizz.

"Because if a baby does not drop out of MY cunt it is UNWORTHY being loved or even being ALIVE!"

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-02 10:24

>>5
people are just too obsessed with the idea of having related blood. me personally, i don't see the big deal. sharing similar dna doesn't mean anything, bonds can form without needing that technicality.. and blood relations can be assholes.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-02 11:08

>>6
It's also easier to initiate and maintain a sexual relationship if you aren't related by blood

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-02 16:33

>>7
:(

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-02 16:53

>>1

This kind of question makes no sense.  When is anyone ever in a position to decide if parents should die, or if non parents should die?  NEVER!!!  Why ask?  It's like asking, what should I do today???  Have dinner with a magical elf, or take a trip to Saturn?

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-02 17:06

>>7
I didn't have problems telling my sister to do certain things

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-02 20:25

>>9
The asumtion is that you'd be in some disaster and only have time to save one, and know that you only have time for one, knowing that one was a parent and one wasn't, and that you'd be able to weigh the consequences of each in the milli-second before it is too late to act to save either.
Also asuming that you wouldn't simply be running for your own life from whatever.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-02 20:51

>>11

I am still failing to see the relevance of the question because the assumption will never happen.

But even if the assumption happened on regular basis, the relevance of the question is still lacking.  If one person has to die, then one person has to die.  That's no good no matter who is chosen to live.  Basically, any number of arguments could theorhetically be used to justify saving either of the persons.  Therefore, the original question is 100% completely useless on teh grandest of grand scales.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-03 6:51

>>9
how about this- you, a parent and non parent are on a non commercial aeroplane.. you land in the sea (emergency.) you are fine but the others are not. who do you attend to first? it would cross your mind that it might be more important to save one person over another.

i mean, that's not an impossible circumstance. besides, you don't need to be in a situation where both people are going to die immediately. it could just be that people are injured, or could possibly die. it would still be an issue. so there!

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-03 17:08

My first thought is parents should be there for their kids, so save them. But, uh, yeah... That's the problem with that. Parents are rarely there for their kids anyways, so let em die. Damn fuckers brought kids like me into this world when they had no good reason to. My family was fucked up long before I was born, yet what did my mother think? "Aw what the hell, why not have another kid? I hate that son of a bitch I'm married to, but why not fuck up my family even more?" And what about Africans? "Gee, my last 9 children all died of starvation... hmm, so maybe... I should let those 3 men fuck me some more so I have another 8 kids and watch them starve to death too, hurray!"

>>5 makes a good point too. And where did all those kids who need adopting come from? Some random loser who dumped his girlfriend after she got pregnant.

Apparently a noteable percentage of children don't even know who their real father is. So those feelings ypu have for your "real" parents don't mean squat. Whoever does a good job taking care of you is who matters.

Name: Sgt.Kabu틆뾕kiman魴訾 2012-05-26 20:45

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List