>>5
I'm
>>4, and I just wanted to reply to your comments. Of course if someone doesn't have any money or a job, no prospects, and isn't even working towards getting employment in the future, they're going to be unattractive as a mate. What kind of life can a woman expect if she goes with a NEET, anyway? A certain amount of stability is necessary in order to start a family and raise a child, and if a man seems unable to provide even the basic necessities, why on earth would a woman be attracted to him?
However, the importance of a man's wealth and status is different for different women, I imagine. The man I love is currently unemployed and doesn't have much money to spare, but he's working hard for the future, and our relationship is fulfilling on so many other levels that it's irrelevant to me.