Novas linguas artificielas

Ios as constructas unas novas linguas artificielas. Es unas linguas tres simplas, pors facilitas etudios.

Ques es vos opiniones?

Simplicity is very relative. What seems simple for some people is very weird for others. Generally, if it's similar to your own language it seems simple to you.

That been said, I'm a huge fan of conlangs, but making them for fun, not because of any notion of making "easy languages" for "international communication".

I speak Spanish and French and I understand what you're saying. But how do you think you're new lingua is different from Esperanto for example?

Sounds like an Esperanto fork, what the fuck are you doing that Esperanto doesn't already achieve? Nothing?
The only reason I had any hint of what you were saying is because I studied Esperanto and speak English natively. I can tell you probably speak Spanish.
Making a language that's 'easy to study' is extremely relative to the population studying it.
Consider the fact that you don't even have any textbooks, courses or teachers for the language but yourself.

Conlangs are fun to make though. I have one myself which is basically a Japanese/English/Esperanto derived beast, it's pictographic and ideographic and lacks properly prescribed grammar let alone practical to speak.

Whys is theres ans S ats thes ends of everys words? Is this yours ideas ofs a jokes?

>>5
Perhapsss itsss ssspoken by sssnake-people

Well, ssstereotypical sssnake-people that sssimply ssstretch their esssesss but otherwissse possssessss the sssame vocal ssstructuresss asss humansss

In all ssseriousssness seriousness though, conlangs and conlangery are great fun, but in my honest opinion striving for "perfect" or "easy to learn" languages isn't all that entertaining, particularly if you're also in to building "conworlds" to complement such a language (and vice versa) and are looking to emulate a language that evolved within a con-culture, rather than was constructed.