Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Marking Reaction Images as not Images.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 17:42

I submit and request the idea that all posts on the image boards have a box that anyone posting a "reaction image" is required to check (or it asks you "Is this a reaction image?" whenever posting a pic).  If an image is so marked, then it will not count towards the "10 image replies omitted" displayed in threads.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 17:45

Also, people will be banned/warned if their threads are not marked as such.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 20:00

That is a very silly idea.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-09 0:14

>3
No, it's a useful idea.  Do you want to be pressing "Reply" when there's no real pics to see, just idiotic faces and the like? No, of course you don't.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-09 8:30

>>1
u mad?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-09 19:32

>>7
No, it's a useful idea.  Do you want to be pressing "Reply" when there's no real pics to see, just idiotic faces and the like?
Such is the Internet. You cannot fight it. Perhaps browsing boards outside of 4chan once in a while would help you?
No, of course you don't.
¯\(°_o)/¯

>>8
The correct spelling and grammar is "Are you mad?". You're welcome.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-14 19:41

Okay, fine, someone tell me then what the benefit of the current system is over one that does not count reaction images?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 4:58

I have a better solution. Why don't you stop using those stupid reaction images?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 11:00

>>11
I agree, but they won't.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List